I got in just a couple of hours to play last night. Playing as Netherlands, with Germany not too close but not too far away.
He was quite unabashed about attacking a neighboring CS (in keeping with his shtick, I suppose), and with settling down my throat. This combination of conquest and settling well enough that I doubt loyalty pressure would ever tilt against him. He then aggressively poached away tiles that were in contention between us. And all the while, he's smiling and laying the ground for friendship. What a bastard!
I was going to ask him to not settle cities on top of me, but it now requires diplomatic favor to issue such a request. And in the absence of such a promise, there's no grievance for settling too close. He did earn a pair of 50 grievances for attacking the CS, with whom I had envoys. However, the act of denouncing and declaring a formal war eclipses that, making me the jerk. This is in the ancient and classical eras.
So, I'm pondering whether there are issues that should be addressed. For instance, if I am the suzerain of a CS, I basically have to delcare a surprise war to defend it from aggression (probably can't wait five turns). Again though, it seems the grievances I earn eclipses the aggressor's.
As I said, these are only based on a couple hours of play, so some have more empirical evidence to go off of...?
He was quite unabashed about attacking a neighboring CS (in keeping with his shtick, I suppose), and with settling down my throat. This combination of conquest and settling well enough that I doubt loyalty pressure would ever tilt against him. He then aggressively poached away tiles that were in contention between us. And all the while, he's smiling and laying the ground for friendship. What a bastard!
I was going to ask him to not settle cities on top of me, but it now requires diplomatic favor to issue such a request. And in the absence of such a promise, there's no grievance for settling too close. He did earn a pair of 50 grievances for attacking the CS, with whom I had envoys. However, the act of denouncing and declaring a formal war eclipses that, making me the jerk. This is in the ancient and classical eras.
So, I'm pondering whether there are issues that should be addressed. For instance, if I am the suzerain of a CS, I basically have to delcare a surprise war to defend it from aggression (probably can't wait five turns). Again though, it seems the grievances I earn eclipses the aggressor's.
As I said, these are only based on a couple hours of play, so some have more empirical evidence to go off of...?