The Norse Thread

trexeric

Deity
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
2,631
About a year ago I completed my master's degree in Medieval Norse Studies, so I decided to put my degree to use for the first time in a year by providing feedback for the Norse game.

The Norse are super fun and dynamic. You get to be a real menace, and between all the potential targets for conquest and raiding there are a lot of different directions you can take the game. It's not that hard - I suck at the game and usually play on Heir, but I managed a win on Regent without too much trouble - but I don't think it needs to be much harder (more on that later).

One thing I want to note is something which was mentioned here recently, the difference between the start dates. It baffles me how different 3000 BC (really 550 AD) and 600 AD are. I am of the opinion that 600 AD should look a lot more like 3000 BC, particularly in the starting army. Unless 600 AD is supposed to be the hard version?

UHV 1 - NORMAN CONQUESTS: Control the core of any European civilization in 1050 AD

Overall, I think this is a great goal and I would change nothing about the goal itself. That said, I have a couple of notes.

Firstly, the Celtic core overlaps with the French core, which makes it redundant to include on the potential target list. That would be different, though, if the "Celtic core" was their second core, Ireland, which would be a great, historically accurate inclusion as a potential target for Norse conquest. Ireland might be a comparatively easier target, but I don't think that's detrimental in a choose-your-own-fun type of UHV goal.

Or the goal could be bumped up to "Control the core of any two European civilizations in 1050 AD", with Ireland as an easy option to pair with a harder option.

I also take issue with the UHV goal name, but I'll make a separate comment here about my aesthetic concerns (since those are lower priority).

UHV 2 - VINLAND SAGA: Be the first to found a city in the Americas by 1100 AD

I think this is a great goal, the only one currently that has you focusing on something other than warfare (settling, culture expansion, technology) than warfare, and I think that's good for the game.

UHV 3 - DANEGELD: Acquire 3000 gold by pillaging, conquering cities and sinking ships by 1500 AD

Overall, very fun goal. My strategy of choice was to target France a bunch, they build so many towns and villages and those are lucrative targets. And of course you get some from the first UHV goal's conquest, especially if you switch to Hegemony.

I do think, right now, the goal is a bit easy. Thematically it's pretty much the main "Viking" goal, and in that capacity it could be made a bit more three dimensional. For one thing, it gives you plenty of time, and I think it would be good to push it back to 1250 AD, Sweden's spawn date and the end of the Norse civilization's representation of Scandinavia as a whole.

It also strikes me that the current array of options to acquire the gold (pillaging, conquering, and sinking ships) are all ways that the Norse built their wealth, but they don't actually represent what "Danegeld" was. Danegeld was protection money, paid to the Norse so that they would not target those paying them. In-game, this is pretty much demanding tribute, or exacting a tribute payment in exchange for peace. My first thought was to include tribute payments (meaning these) into the required goal, but I think it could go further than that.

A currently unrepresented-in-UHV aspect of Norse civilization is their prowess as traders. Their trade routes extended across Eastern Europe down to Byzantium and the Caliphates, not to mention the trading they did in Western Europe alongside their raiding and conquest. Since what I just laid out as a truer in-game representation of Danegeld would fall under the larger umbrella of "trade", perhaps a second part could be added to this goal, to acquire x amount of gold through trade. This would be similar to the Dravidian goal, so it would include lump sum trades (including tribute), gold per turn trades, gold passively acquired through trade routes, and Great Merchant trade missions. The necessity to produce a Great Merchant would be great cohesion with the Trading Post UB's merchant slot.

So, my proposed overhaul of this goal would look something like this: Acquire 3000 gold by pillaging, conquering cities and sinking ships and 3000 (?) gold by trade by 1250 AD

UP, UB, and UUs


I have no notes on these, wouldn't change a thing.

Like I said, I'll make my aesthetic notes in a second comment since those are lower priority. But I would like to bring attention to a couple more things:

1. Christianization
Catholicism spreads to Scandinavia and the AI Norse convert wayyy to early, which in part compromises their role as antagonist of Europe. It seems that, now, Catholicism spreads almost immediately and you get Christian Norse by, like, 650 AD pretty consistently. In history, there were several attempts to proselytize to the Scandinavians (Ansgar, for example, in the 9th century), but by Civ game mechanics, these missions failed, since they didn't convert any large portion of the population. Arguably Catholicism didn't successfully spread into Scandinavia until Haraldr (Bluetooth) Gormsson's conversion in the 960s.

I wonder if it would be possible to not have Scandinavia as a historical region for Catholicism until ~950, or in some other way prevent its non-missionary spread to Scandinavia until then. This would both be closer to history and foster negative relations between the Norse and the rest of Europe. A prominent reason that the Norse kings converted to Christianity in the 10th and 11th centuries was because it allowed for better relations and greater trade opportunities with the rest of Europe; they shouldn't be given this choice too early.

2. Wonders
The Norse stand out now as one of the few civilizations in this mod without a historical wonder (now that Sweden took the Nobel Prize, which lies outside the scope of the Norse game anyway). I have a couple ideas, I'd be interested to hear if anyone had had any more.

Temple at Uppsala / Gamla Uppsala - Unfortunately I can't come up with a better name, I know it's frowned upon to have a placename in a wonder name. And we don't know where the temple was located nowadays, or even how substantial it actually was, but it earned a very significant reputation, attested in varying degrees by Adam of Bremen, Saxo Grammaticus, and Snorri Sturluson. I envision this wonder as a pagan wonder requiring fur, helping militarily in some way (perhaps a free Commander promotion?) that would benefit a UHV game and a pagan URV game.

Þingvellir - Partially a natural wonder, but it's also emblematic of the unique political structure of Iceland. I think it could be great to tie it into the second UHV goal, like maybe have the effect of speeding up culture spread (over water?). It could be fun and historical to force Iceland to produce a Great Artist to make it to Greenland, to emulate the Icelandic skalds, but that might be too tough with the other UHV change necessitating a Great Merchant. This wonder would have to be super cheap (although a strategy of sending a worker to Iceland to cut down all the forests would be great flavor), maybe it would require a moorland next to the city and fur or something like that?
 
Aesthetic Notes

UHV Names:
Norman Conquests
- This is the one I take the greatest issue with. It doesn't really represent the Normans well at all, nor should it - I don't think the Norse as a civilization are really equipped to encompass the French-speaking Normans. It even gives a finish line in 1050, before the Norse conquest of England in 1066. More convincingly it represents conquests of Vikings like the sons of Ragnar, Sweyn Forkbeard, Cnut the Great, or the Hiberno-Norse in Ireland. I propose Great Heathen Army as a replacement.
Vinland Saga - There were, of course, two Vinland Sagas, Eiríks saga rauða (the Saga of Erik the Red) and Grœnlendinga saga (the Saga of the Greenlanders). I simply propose to make it plural, so Vinland Sagas instead.
Danegeld - So long as tribute payments are added into the total goal as I said in the first post, I have no issue with the name (except vaguely that it refers to a very specific thing but is a pretty broad goal, but I don't think there's a better name).

Great People
A while ago I overhauled the Norse Great Person list on Steb's spreadsheet as part of separating it from the Swedish Great Person list (which I also overhauled). I just wanted to talk a bit about my philosophy. For one thing, I wanted a greater focus on the Medieval Era for the Norse, since that's where all of their UHV game takes place. In this regard, I'm only really unsatisfied with the Great Engineer list, since the Norse weren't exactly known for their building (another reason they don't have a wonder yet). I'll keep trying to find a good candidate there.

I also wanted to focus my lists on Great People that would be coming up often, and since the Norse game is one of constant warfare, I thought it fitting that the Great General list should be longer. I'm just a bit tired of seeing Hlaðgerðr and Eiríkr blóðøx every time, variety is good and there's plenty to choose from among Viking warlords. My current list has 9 in the Medieval Era.

A third aspect is nationality. I tried to more or less evenly distribute the Great People among Danes, Norwegians, pre-1250 Swedes, Icelanders, a couple Faroese from the old list, and I also fit a Gutnish guy in there too.

Dynamic Civilization Names
Currently, the spawn name of the Norse is "Scandinavian Althings", which I am not a fan of for a few reasons. The biggest is that there is only one Alþing, the one in Iceland. The other regional things had their own names, like Gulaþing or Frostuþing. So a better name would be "Scandinavian Things", although I admit that sounds a bit strange.

Maybe a simpler solution would be to just have the Norse called "Scandinavian / Norse Jarldoms" at the start, and change to "Scandinavian Kingdoms" when a certain threshold of city number is reached. The civics shouldn't change much, the kingdoms even into the 12th and 13th century were to varying degrees elective.

I also take issue with the "Kalmar Union" name. Right now it comes about, from what I gather, when the Norse are Christian and control all of Scandinavia, but this results in a much too early Kalmar Union. The Kalmar Union should really only come about after the Swedish spawn, when the Norse have reconquered Sweden or vassalized it. Before the Swedish spawn they should just be Scandinavian Kingdoms. After, they should be Kingdom of Denmark-Norway or Norway-Denmark (depending on capital location) until they manage to bring Sweden back into the fray.

I might have more dynamic civ name thoughts. I'll come back and edit things here if I do.

EDIT: More dynamic civ name thoughts.

Spoiler Vassal Name Ideas :

Vassal Names (with the assumption you want to stay away from ðs and þs, correct me if not):
  • Regency of Sweden (Sweden as Norse vassal) - as in the regency of Sten Sture during the Kalmar Union
  • Principality of Koenugard (Rus as Norse vassal)
  • Principality of Gardariki (Russia as Norse vassal)
  • Principality of Saxland (Holy Rome as Norse vassal)
  • Principality of Pulinaland (Poland as Norse vassal)
  • Principality of Langbardaland (Italy as Norse vassal)
  • Principality of Frakkland (France as Norse vassal)
  • Principality of Spanland (Spain as Norse vassal)
  • Kingdom of the Isles (Celts as Norse vassal)
  • Kingdom of Miklagard (Byzantium as Norse vassal)
  • Kingdom of Serkland (Arabia as Norse vassal)
  • Kingdom of Blaland (Moors as Norse vassal)
  • Kingdom of Tyrkland (Turks as Norse vassal)
  • Danelaw (England as Norse vassal (current))
  • Danish / Norwegian Gold Coast (Mali as Norse vassal)

Maybe the Old Norse names can expire with the end of the Medieval Era, but I don't think that matters much since the Norse game is so medieval-centric. I do think it's important to have a lot of fun possibilities for vassals, since capitulation is not uncommon when playing for the Norse UHV.
 
Last edited:
Great posts, nice to see fellow historian giving feedback and ideas for this mod!

My additional suggestions would be mostly cosmetic ones.
I think "Norse Kingdoms" is better than "Scandinavian Kingdoms". Scandinavia is a good general name, but it feels somewhat "artificial" and foreign, unlike Norse. Also I would add to your good historical reasoning the fact that these kingdoms often were united by successful monarch, and divided again, that's why it's fitting to represent them all as one civ.

My biggest suggestion is changing Norse color to red and white to better differentiate it from Sweden, and because it is dominant colour of Danish and Norwegian symbols. For emblem there are some ideas (keeping the current raven banner, or maybe a broadaxe or unhistorical viking helmet), but they all are too tied to Viking age. Instead, I think something like CoA of Norway, a standing lion with axe, could be better as a more general symbol, that doesn't feel weird to see both during the Viking age, and if Denmark-Norway lasts into later ages.

Well, I generally suggest stressing Norse civ as Denmark-Norway, considering Sweden is separate civ now. Perhaps, one of the goals can be set later, somewhere after 1500 AD? Though, the only things that come to mind are either founding some colonies, like Denmark-Norway did, or maybe be first to discover some techs? For any additional goal, I would suggest uniting first two goals into something like "Conquerors and Explorers: control the core of an European civilization and be first to found a city in America by 1100 AD", then the second goal about gold from raiding and trading in 1250, then a third goal.
P.S. After briefly looking on map of all colonies and trading posts Denmark-Norway ever had, a "funky" goal came to my mind: control (coastal) cities on every (settleable) terrain type in 1700 AD. The goal is intended to be a bit humourous contrast to Denmark being composed of only flat grassland tiles (Norway is more diverse, though), but it also is less feasible considering diversity of terrain types we now have.
P.P.S. Of course, the third historical goal of Denmark should be being better than Sweden at any time. Jokes aside, maybe third goal could be something about "little competition" with Sweden?
 
I think a Norse with a primary color matching the red in Denmark's flag would look nice on the map. It could blur with England if you have an especially active Norse though.
 
My additional suggestions would be mostly cosmetic ones.
I think "Norse Kingdoms" is better than "Scandinavian Kingdoms". Scandinavia is a good general name, but it feels somewhat "artificial" and foreign, unlike Norse. Also I would add to your good historical reasoning the fact that these kingdoms often were united by successful monarch, and divided again, that's why it's fitting to represent them all as one civ.
I think you're right, my suggestion was in the context of the starting name being "Scandinavian Althings", which I was not a fan of. That name suggested to me that a name with "Scandinavian" was desired. Luckily from what I have seen (most recently in Hickman888's France video) the starting name is now "Norse Kingdoms" until conversion to Christianity, which I think is the best option, foregoing all of the distinctions between civic types. It's simple and it fits.

My biggest suggestion is changing Norse color to red and white to better differentiate it from Sweden, and because it is dominant colour of Danish and Norwegian symbols. For emblem there are some ideas (keeping the current raven banner, or maybe a broadaxe or unhistorical viking helmet), but they all are too tied to Viking age. Instead, I think something like CoA of Norway, a standing lion with axe, could be better as a more general symbol, that doesn't feel weird to see both during the Viking age, and if Denmark-Norway lasts into later ages.
I think this would look good, though it would have to be a sufficiently distinct color from England's red and Poland's pink. I think the current raven banner is the best look when you're playing the Norse as Vikings in the Medieval Era, but you're right that it looks weird when it's just the Kingdom of Denmark or whatever later on. The lion with axe might be a better middle ground between that and a Nordic cross (which I think would look best if you were playing a post-medieval game).

Well, I generally suggest stressing Norse civ as Denmark-Norway, considering Sweden is separate civ now. Perhaps, one of the goals can be set later, somewhere after 1500 AD? Though, the only things that come to mind are either founding some colonies, like Denmark-Norway did, or maybe be first to discover some techs? For any additional goal, I would suggest uniting first two goals into something like "Conquerors and Explorers: control the core of an European civilization and be first to found a city in America by 1100 AD", then the second goal about gold from raiding and trading in 1250, then a third goal.
I could see it working, although I do quite enjoy how the Norse game is structured currently as a madcap, berserk-paced, short-yet-crowded purely medieval game. I'd worry that a third, post-Sweden spawn goal would feel like an epilogue to an otherwise action-packed game.

If this was a direction that Leoreth wanted to go in, maybe a goal of reconquering Sweden (establishing the Kalmar Union) and settling colonies? Maybe it could be interesting to have a goal tied to accomplishing historical feats with ahistorical stability, like control all of Scandinavia and X colonies with solid stability in, say, 1650. This could be challenging, especially with how your Viking Age actions tend to (in my experience) ravage your stability.

If a colony goal were added, I'd suggest adding a few Natives spawning in Newfoundland to make Vinland harder to hold onto past the Medieval Era. Honestly that might be good anyway even with the current goal, since it's historical.

In other news I'm super excited to see that my suggestions of controlling two European cores and having the Celtic core in Ireland have been adopted. I haven't had the time to play much recently but I'm thrilled to get back to it sometime and play a Norse game where Ireland is a viable conquest/settlement area.
 
Last edited:
Luckily from what I have seen (most recently in Hickman888's France video) the starting name is now "Norse Kingdoms" until conversion to Christianity, which I think is the best option, foregoing all of the distinctions between civic types. It's simple and it fits.
Speaking of the dynamic names of the Norse in Hickman888's France video, I notice that on respawn the default name was "Scandinavian Althings" again, and then it became "Scandinavian Empire". The first name certainly doesn't make sense in the 16th century, and the latter name doesn't make sense when Sweden is independent.

On respawn, the name should logically be "Kingdom of Denmark-Norway" (or Norway-Denmark, I guess, depending on where the capital is, but the capital should probably always be Copenhagen on respawn). "Scandinavian Empire" should only really exist if the Norse manage to reunite Scandinavia and beat the Swedes (maybe also with some additional caveat (colonies? era?) to distinguish it from the "Kalmar Union" name, which is pretty much the same criteria).
 
Speaking of the dynamic names of the Norse in Hickman888's France video, I notice that on respawn the default name was "Scandinavian Althings" again, and then it became "Scandinavian Empire". The first name certainly doesn't make sense in the 16th century, and the latter name doesn't make sense when Sweden is independent.

On respawn, the name should logically be "Kingdom of Denmark-Norway" (or Norway-Denmark, I guess, depending on where the capital is, but the capital should probably always be Copenhagen on respawn). "Scandinavian Empire" should only really exist if the Norse manage to reunite Scandinavia and beat the Swedes (maybe also with some additional caveat (colonies? era?) to distinguish it from the "Kalmar Union" name, which is pretty much the same criteria).
The last time I played the Vikings, I think I remember I got the "Scandinavian Althings" dynamic name after I adopted Citizenship. Which, considering the UP of the Vikings, I would think would be the go-to civic when going for a historical game.
 
The last time I played the Vikings, I think I remember I got the "Scandinavian Althings" dynamic name after I adopted Citizenship. Which, considering the UP of the Vikings, I would think would be the go-to civic when going for a historical game.
Hm, it seems you're right. I thought before that it was tied to Elective, and maybe it used to be (since it used to be the name you start with). In any case I think if it is to be tied to any civic, that civic should be Republic, rather than Citizenship.

And of course I still take issue with the name on the basis of the fact that there's only one Althing, in Iceland, and something like "Scandinavian Things" would fit a lot better (if be a bit weird-looking).
 
Back
Top Bottom