Lockesdonkey
Liberal Jihadist
Explains itself. I will elaborate though.
("Resolved: that the United States Federal Government should establish a foreign policy substantially increasing its support of United Nations peacekeeping operations."--U.S. National High School Debate Topic, 2004-2005)
When the UN is founded, and if, as we all hope, it is revamped, it can establish a UN Peacekeeping Operation (From now on UN PKO). The process goes thusly:
1.
Now, "what's in it for me?" Better reputation, greater likelihood of being elected Secretary-General, better relations with the sides who were involved in the conflict, etc., etc., etc.
I'm thinking of a Rapid Reaction Force (or Rapid Deployment Force, same thing), but am wondering how it might work.
("Resolved: that the United States Federal Government should establish a foreign policy substantially increasing its support of United Nations peacekeeping operations."--U.S. National High School Debate Topic, 2004-2005)
When the UN is founded, and if, as we all hope, it is revamped, it can establish a UN Peacekeeping Operation (From now on UN PKO). The process goes thusly:
1.
A civil war breaks out in Country X; five cities are rebelling, and have declared independence as Country Y.
2. Country X wants its land back. Country Y does not have recognition of important countries (let's not get into that) and is not a member of the UN (let's not get into that either), but Country X is, and asks the UN for a PKO.
3. A meeting of the UN is convoked. The nations vote to approve or disapprove the PKO. Requires an absolute majority of voting members to pass(i.e. over half of those nations which did not abstain). Part of the proposal is the "mandate", indicating how long it applies.
4. The PKO applies within a "crisis zone"; it is all of Country X and Country Y.
5. Nations can send troops to their capitals, where the "become peacekeeper" action pops up. If a unit becomes a peacekeeper, it is whisked off to the crisis zone, and parts of the unit turn light blue (not the national insignia, though), and if it's mechanized, a great big "UN" appears on it (last part not necessary).
6. While in the crisis zone, a peacekeeper can be stationed in any city and will cause two content faces in the city, regardless of government type. The presence of UN peacekeepers can also have an effect on the outcome of the civil war. It may result in reincorporation of the rebelling nation into the original or recognition of the breakaway by the original. Either way, peacekeepers in a city preclude cities of other nations from attacking--so if Country X decides to Country Y, and Country Y's capital City Y has peacekeepers, then Country X can't attack City Y. Peacekeepers have an "area of effect"; a peacekeeper stationed in a square precludes all combat within a one-square radius. If a peacekeeper leaves the crisis zone, it returns to national control and mis instantly transported to its capital. During the course of the PKO, the peacekeepers are under the control of the UN; a nation is designated to lead the effort by controlling the operation. If it's an AI nation, the AI should programmed to distribute the peacekeeping troops across the crisis zone to prevent conflict as much as possible. If it's you, you ought to do the same thing, thank you very much.
Now, "what's in it for me?" Better reputation, greater likelihood of being elected Secretary-General, better relations with the sides who were involved in the conflict, etc., etc., etc.
I'm thinking of a Rapid Reaction Force (or Rapid Deployment Force, same thing), but am wondering how it might work.