NP300: Yes, I agree with everything you said. This is a sensible plan because it does not change gameplay very much while at the same time it improves the complexity of the gameplay enough to raise the enjoyment of both naval and land battles. I don't have any programming experience so I don't know what you can mod, but if Firaxis's desire to have everything moddable means that you can design and create a pop-up menu which gives players new options to gameplay then this would be a stunning and fabulous development. But it's hard for a computer-illiterate fella like me to comprehend how this would be done though.
what about draws as battle outcome?
- Thread starter SenJarJar
- Start date
KrikkitTwo
Immortal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 12,418
Common retreats are good if there is some cost to healing damaged units, and/or if Maintenance costs are high.
toh6wy
Emperor
stormbind said:There is no such thing as a draw in battle!
However, both sides could claim victory - which happens
What about the draw between the Monitor and the Virginia?
They both lost (later): Monitor in a storm, Virginia by its port being captured (I think).toh6wy said:
Aussie,
I like your system if there is a limit to combat 'pulses'. So that, in a battle, you get 5 shots each or somesuch to damage opponent, and must in turn survive five of their attempts ... after this time, you each go back to pre-combat positions ...
Is that what you had in mind?
I like your system if there is a limit to combat 'pulses'. So that, in a battle, you get 5 shots each or somesuch to damage opponent, and must in turn survive five of their attempts ... after this time, you each go back to pre-combat positions ...
Is that what you had in mind?
toh6wy
Emperor
Jaybe said:They both lost (later): Monitor in a storm, Virginia by its port being captured (I think).
Still, my point stands. Neither was able to defeat the other; what happened after that is irrelevant.
