Vexus
Chieftain
Posted this in general, but then realized it would be more appropriate here and I was surprised at the minimal response:
" This is a difficult topic to use the search function with, so my apologies if this has been covered multiple times, but . . .
Can I presume that "nearby" when referring to a building's requirement for a resource means within the BFH? If so, placing Iron, Horses, Elephants, Sea Resources, Wine and Incense in reach of at least 2 if not 3 city's BFH would be a basic pillar of strategic city placement, correct?
Somebody said they thought nearby meant being worked, and I originally thought so too, but then the wording of the requirements for the mint made me think otherwise:
"Each source of citys worked Gold and Silver provides an extra +3
Gold."
If "nearby" means worked within a city's BFH. Then does anyone know if horses is within 2 BFH's and you switch the worked resource from one city to the other (allowing you to build a circus in each), would the happiness effect of the circus only remain valid so long as the resource was worked by that city? . . .
" This is a difficult topic to use the search function with, so my apologies if this has been covered multiple times, but . . .
Can I presume that "nearby" when referring to a building's requirement for a resource means within the BFH? If so, placing Iron, Horses, Elephants, Sea Resources, Wine and Incense in reach of at least 2 if not 3 city's BFH would be a basic pillar of strategic city placement, correct?
Somebody said they thought nearby meant being worked, and I originally thought so too, but then the wording of the requirements for the mint made me think otherwise:
"Each source of citys worked Gold and Silver provides an extra +3
Gold."
If "nearby" means worked within a city's BFH. Then does anyone know if horses is within 2 BFH's and you switch the worked resource from one city to the other (allowing you to build a circus in each), would the happiness effect of the circus only remain valid so long as the resource was worked by that city? . . .