Gori the Grey
The Poster
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 13,458
I came up with the following idea while playing Civ V, but too late to implement it.
I'm going to play up through the difficulty levels, one game at each.
As I start each level, I get to roll two starts--everything random except world size and speed, those both at normal--and choose between those two which one I'd prefer to play. (This keeps me from having to play an utter dog of a start, but if I roll two bad starts, well, then one of my challenges at that difficulty level will be playing out of a bad start (but at least I can still play the least bad of two)). I get to play through the zero turn before making that decision (i.e. move my starting warrior one move). But once I've chosen, I have to play that game through to the bitter end.
If I win consecutive games at increasing levels of difficulty up to the highest level, I will have beat the game.
In other words, I'm giving myself eight games to learn how to beat the game at the highest level (assuming there are 8 difficulty levels again).
Also, I can't come on this site to learn strategies. I have to figure out the optimal strategies entirely on my own.
I don't mean to start until the major bugs are worked out of the game. With Civ V they completely redid the social policy trees and it threw off one of my games.
And when I do play, I'll play each of my games very slowly, trying to figure out every angle.
So don't expect to hear from me on the success of this venture until a good while after the game is released. I'll necro this thread to tell anyone who might be interested how it all went, what level I first lost at, or whether I managed this feat..
How 'bout you all? Beating it once at the highest level? Getting every victory at the highest level? Winning once? What would count as "beating the game" in your mind?
I'm going to play up through the difficulty levels, one game at each.
As I start each level, I get to roll two starts--everything random except world size and speed, those both at normal--and choose between those two which one I'd prefer to play. (This keeps me from having to play an utter dog of a start, but if I roll two bad starts, well, then one of my challenges at that difficulty level will be playing out of a bad start (but at least I can still play the least bad of two)). I get to play through the zero turn before making that decision (i.e. move my starting warrior one move). But once I've chosen, I have to play that game through to the bitter end.
If I win consecutive games at increasing levels of difficulty up to the highest level, I will have beat the game.
In other words, I'm giving myself eight games to learn how to beat the game at the highest level (assuming there are 8 difficulty levels again).
Also, I can't come on this site to learn strategies. I have to figure out the optimal strategies entirely on my own.
I don't mean to start until the major bugs are worked out of the game. With Civ V they completely redid the social policy trees and it threw off one of my games.
And when I do play, I'll play each of my games very slowly, trying to figure out every angle.
So don't expect to hear from me on the success of this venture until a good while after the game is released. I'll necro this thread to tell anyone who might be interested how it all went, what level I first lost at, or whether I managed this feat..
How 'bout you all? Beating it once at the highest level? Getting every victory at the highest level? Winning once? What would count as "beating the game" in your mind?