PinkHammurabi
Warlord
Hey guys, got a quick question.
I'm still in the early stages of my first game as I had some extremely frustrating installation-then-graphical issues (which still somewhat persist, and will require a separate thread sometime soon), so I don't know how things play out in Civ VI in the long run yet, which keeps me from being able to decide between two tiles for my next city. (I haven't posted an image before from my hard drive, if this is the wrong way to do so, please inform me, and please forgive my ignorance).
Essentially I cannot decide between where my Warrior is located, or the Desert tile to the west. By settling between the Warrior and the Oasis, I can access every tile surrounding Piopiotahi which all get an extra Gold and Culture (stacking). That leads to some very strong tiles, such as the Stone that I've highlighted with 2 Food/Prod/Gold/Culture that I wouldn't have next to the river. However, after years of Civving I'm predisposed to greatly favoring settling adjacent to rivers, which grants access to things like Water Mills and other River-Adjacent-Only buildings and bonuses.
Since I don't yet know how many river-required buildings et al. there are in Civ VI compared to Civ V (I saw Water Mills in the tree, though, but that's it) and such large area bonuses are new to Civ VI, I'm having a hard time knowing which will be more beneficial when all is said and done.
Being my first game I threw the difficulty down and ultimately I know that either will be more than sufficient, but since I only play on Marathon I'll be dealing with the results of the choice for some time, and otherwise it's simply useful information in general.
Any help or advice is very appreciated. Thanks in advance!
I'm still in the early stages of my first game as I had some extremely frustrating installation-then-graphical issues (which still somewhat persist, and will require a separate thread sometime soon), so I don't know how things play out in Civ VI in the long run yet, which keeps me from being able to decide between two tiles for my next city. (I haven't posted an image before from my hard drive, if this is the wrong way to do so, please inform me, and please forgive my ignorance).
Essentially I cannot decide between where my Warrior is located, or the Desert tile to the west. By settling between the Warrior and the Oasis, I can access every tile surrounding Piopiotahi which all get an extra Gold and Culture (stacking). That leads to some very strong tiles, such as the Stone that I've highlighted with 2 Food/Prod/Gold/Culture that I wouldn't have next to the river. However, after years of Civving I'm predisposed to greatly favoring settling adjacent to rivers, which grants access to things like Water Mills and other River-Adjacent-Only buildings and bonuses.
Since I don't yet know how many river-required buildings et al. there are in Civ VI compared to Civ V (I saw Water Mills in the tree, though, but that's it) and such large area bonuses are new to Civ VI, I'm having a hard time knowing which will be more beneficial when all is said and done.
Being my first game I threw the difficulty down and ultimately I know that either will be more than sufficient, but since I only play on Marathon I'll be dealing with the results of the choice for some time, and otherwise it's simply useful information in general.
Any help or advice is very appreciated. Thanks in advance!