Who had completed all the levels?
- Thread starter pt1
- Start date
I usaully don't play to 'win'. I have played for years and have never seen a winning screen. However, I would rank myself between a Prince and a Warlord.
My games usually go along the lines of: Make an enbasey with every nation. Mantain world peace.
My games usually go along the lines of: Make an enbasey with every nation. Mantain world peace.
Marx
Warlord
Late nineties were my best years. I completed some emperor games.
This days I only read this forum and don't play civilization any more. Last game I started was on the 'Prince-Level' (three or four months ago) . It was nog very convincing, but I had won this game without very much troubles.
This days I only read this forum and don't play civilization any more. Last game I started was on the 'Prince-Level' (three or four months ago) . It was nog very convincing, but I had won this game without very much troubles.
On civilization i found that victory by 1AD was possible no matter what level you play it on. Including conquest, space race etc. Well ok space race would take a litte longer on the top levels but you get what i mean. Certainly not so easy on Civ 2 and 3. Still although i have not played civilization for years its still a great and i wont ever get rid of it. Pity it doesnt work on this PC.
GoldBerg
CivDosPlayer of '91
it will work with "XP"...Himalia said:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=110143
.
.
.
i prefer constructive peace games with nice landscapes...
that's why i like most to play chieftain, everything else is stress.
You better 
Or you will feel the wrath of my kiwi diplomats!
Or you will feel the wrath of my kiwi diplomats!
