Would any set dimension (eg 3 dimensions) have obvious borders to the next one?

Kyriakos

Creator
Joined
Oct 15, 2003
Messages
78,218
Location
The Dream
I was thinking of some bizarre things, but I won't post those, instead choosing to post something only half-bizarre I thought.
So the question is this: assuming there exist more dimensions (there isn't much reason to think there aren't, just humans don't sense them), wouldn't it be more likely that any dangerous realm outside, such as in 3+x dimensions, would be potentially lethal for a 3d-lander? And if so, wouldn't it make sense from a practical standpoint to have 3d beings just identify a potential "outside" as something very far away and/or reachable only in very specific and unusual conditions?

If we take it the other way round, something hypothetically living in 2d won't have a sense of (eg) height, but this would mean it should also never go anywhere which has a height-dimension, else there it risks being maimed or otherwise destroyed by any 3d being. But one has to suppose that the easier way to secure that a 2d being won't reach 3d in any way would be to have a border to 3d be very distinct. After all, you can't just go to space without meaning to - you have to develop spaceships and then board one (not saying space is the 4d for us, just that any theoretical reachable entry point to 4d - it may not even exist - would be very clearly sensed by a 3d being as a border).

Obviously those borders (from 2d to 3d, from 3d to 4d etc) would be sensed as objects of the previous dimension. (assuming any border point is actually reachable; this is also a hypothesis)

The other reply would be to assume xd things can chaotically reach x+1d at times, and so do all the time, but not as often that this leads to clear danger.
 
Fantasy can be whatever you want it to be, that's what makes it so wonderful!

I do find though, the less you try to explain it to pretend it's "real," the more fun it is.
 
Seems to me any lower-dimensional being would have no trouble surviving in a higher-d space, but they might have trouble finding their way around. E.g. a two-dimensional being stuck in a 3-d space would only be able to move forward or backward, perceiving only a single 2-d "slice" of the 3-d space as the entire reality.

Where you might run into Critical Existence Failure would be a higher-dimensional being somehow consigned to a lower-dimensional space.
 
Seems to me any lower-dimensional being would have no trouble surviving in a higher-d space, but they might have trouble finding their way around. E.g. a two-dimensional being stuck in a 3-d space would only be able to move forward or backward, perceiving only a single 2-d "slice" of the 3-d space as the entire reality.

Where you might run into Critical Existence Failure would be a higher-dimensional being somehow consigned to a lower-dimensional space.

Hm, I was under the impression that if 2d beings do exist, they are safe from 3d beings in the same space cause they do not move in anything sensed as moving space by the 3d beings (maybe a case for such would be some 'void' between elementary particles, if final particles in a dimension do exist). So if that was so, a 2d being which could alter its (let's say height) position even infinitesimally may run a serious risk of colliding with matter in a higher dimension.
 
If you (as a 3d being) happen to catch a 2d being edge-on you'll see nothing. If you catch it face-on you'll see it. No?
 
If you (as a 3d being) happen to catch a 2d being edge-on you'll see nothing. If you catch it face-on you'll see it. No?

I don't think so. (real) 2d isn't visible in 3d. Likewise, if you draw a line, it isn't real 1d, because it still has volume (is 3d), it is just that the naked eye doesn't identify it.
 
Back
Top Bottom