Dairuka
Prince
That is a great picture. And about the 30 vs 1 empire thing. Maybe that is saying that they were not the greatest empires after all if they could fall so easily. It was an earth-shattering thing when the Roman empire collapsed (as well as the Persians) but some of those other ones weren't as big of a deal.
Many euro-centric historians also believed that the supposed 'collapse' of the roman empire had more of an effect on the world's outcome than any other empire's demise; but I digress. The Roman Empire never collapsed, it declined. Rome was occupied, and as a result the empire evolved to suit the times. It never officially collapsed until 1453, and by then it had already declined to a point where it was no longer important.
The whole notion of a 'Byzantine' empire boggles the mind really.
The Dark Ages were well into effect, long before the occupation of Rome.
If anything, the fall of the Frankish and/or Holy Roman Empire had more of an resounding earth-shattering boom than anything. It fractured the world into hundreds of city-states, which led to the advent of vassalage for protection.