WW2-Carrier

[CCJ39]

here is papajohns' WW2-Carrier as MF-unit

Download

 

[elementgoo]

cool

 

[bipolar]

That looks great!!

One question: The mf-units work exactly the same way like "normal" units do!?

 

[CCJ39]

thanks

yes (only the animation-file <.flc> is different), you also can replace another unit-animation with this one

 

[KaNick]

The download isn't working. When I try to open it I just get a page with giberish on it.

Edit: Nevermind, I tried internet explorer and it worked fiine.

 

[CCJ39]

hm, never heard befor about such problems, which browser are using?

I also modified the link, maybe you can try it again with your browser (IE works with both links)

 

[Gogf]

The same thing happens to me sometimes. But, it works fine when I click "Save link to disk."

 

[CCJ39]

hm... thanks

 

[Gogf]

Deleted.

 

[papajohns]

not to advertise my own work...but u should do the essex ones

they seemed to go out in groups rather than the present supercarriers

 

[Gogf]

Okay, CCJ39, the error was with Mozilla Firebird (and maybe other browsers), but it is now fixed in Firebird (now called Firefox).

 

[CCJ39]

ok thanks, I tried it with Netscape4.7 and Mozilla from univerity and IE6SP1 from home without any problems

 

[vsaiyan]

Carriers wouldnt tactically travel in pairs, for the most part. It wouldn't be safe. If that position was attacked, then you lose TWO very expensive/valuable ships, instead of just one. But there is one unit I would really like to see. You could call it a fleet, or wutever. But it could have one carrier, and support for the carrier! That would be a cool MF unit :-D

 

[jzsf]

I agree with vsaiyan

 

[eric_A]

Those ships are not WW2 carriers, they look like
modern Nimitz class carriers.

 

[joebasstard]

I agree that they don't quite look like WWII carriers. See
www.navsource.org/archives/02/09.htm

 

[CCJ39]

I only created a MF-unitversion of this unit by Papajohns

so discuss with Papajohns instead of me about WW2-unit or not