You know...where is the outrage over this?

Mr. Dictator

A Chain-Smoking Fox
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
9,094
Location
Murfreesboro, TN
http://spectator.org/archives/2012/03/16/nbc-news-punk--scandal-e/print

Spoiler :
The cast.

Phil Griffin, the president of MSNBC, NBC's cable sibling.

Brian Williams, anchor of The NBC Nightly News.

Brian Roberts, the Chairman and CEO of Comcast, owners of NBC Universal.

The Reverend Al Sharpton, host of MSNBC's Politics Nation.

And Quicken Loans, one of the original seven national sponsors of The Rush Limbaugh Show that pretentiously dropped Rush's show.

That would be the same MSNBC host Reverend Al Sharpton -- hired by MSNBC president Phil Griffin -- caught on this video clip from Evocateur, a documentary film of the late television host Morton Downey, Jr. Sharpton, seen here on the set of Downey's television show, is heatedly shouting to an audience member:

You ain't nothing, you a punk f*****. Now come on, do something!

That video, provided on YouTube courtesy of Tucker Carlson's The Daily Caller, is in fact an excerpt of a trailer for the film on Downey produced by Ironbound Films. The entire trailer can be found here at the Ironbound site.

The clip of the MSNBC host hired by Mr. Griffin has now surfaced along with a series of Sharpton audio tapes -- found here. Beginning with this reference by Sharpton to the black then-mayor of New York, David Dinkins.

David Dinkins.… You wanna be the only n….on television, the only n….in the newspaper, the only n…to talk.…Don't cover them, don't talk to them, cause you got the only n…problem. Cause you know if a black man stood up next to ya they would see you for the whore that you really are.

Other tapes are littered with derogatory references to "Greek h****," "Chinamen," "Koreans sell us watermelons," and so on.

But there's one video that has not gotten attention.

That would be this one, which features NBC News anchor Brian Williams speaking to the National Action Network Conference

That would be the National Action Network, a progressive group founded by: Al Sharpton. Whom Williams refers to in warm and familiar terms at the end of the tape as "the Reverend Al."

The controversy over the relationship between Sharpton and both MSNBC and NBC News anchor Williams has erupted in the wake of the drive by leftists -- with MSNBC and Media Matters in the front of the pack -- to strip Rush Limbaugh of his sponsors because of the Fluke affair -- and hence push his program off the air.

As president of MSNBC, Griffin is directly responsible for Sharpton's hiring, as well as the relentless attack on Limbaugh's free speech rights. The accusation that MSNBC is terrified of free debate was an accusation made as well by the recently dismissed MSNBC commentator and longtime conservative Pat Buchanan. Buchanan discussed his firing by MSNBC with Fox's Sean Hannity here and here.

I called Mr. Griffin's office directly to get his comments on the Sharpton hate tapes. I was politely shuttled to MSNBC's Vice President of Communications, Jeremy Gaines. Who dutifully inquired as to my concerns.


Bias is very blatant, but I am linking to this because I DO agree (kinda)

Rush should lose his position, as should Sharpton.

Edit: I'll be looking for another link, actually (unless someone beats me to it) since I didn't notice the article's URL, somehow.

Edit, edit: just saw the date this came out. Still, thoughts concerning this in the wake of limbaugh's fiasco?
 
If what you're getting at is that it's an outrage that the country doesn't pay nearly as much attention to Al Sharpton as it does to Rush L., I'm really not sure I agree. I think we need to sit down and have a serious discussion of just what blow-hards we should be paying attention to, or how deeply into their various and sometimes obscure recordings we should delve, and which blow-hards we shouldn't bother about.

Perhaps, in fact, the best thing to do would be to pay less attention to Rush.

Maybe it should be adjusted by audience size and/or influence? Does that seem fair? By that standard I think it makes sense for Rush to draw more outrage. But that could once again just be seemly-objective measures giving conservatives the short end of the stick. By factoring in some assumed-mantle-of-victimhood adjustment, a sort of affirmative action for whinging, things might be more fair.
 
Nothing "surfaced" about Sharpton; everybody knew he'd said these things. I'm surprised the article didn't mention Tawana Brawley, probably the most shameful of the "Rev." Sharpton's antics.
 
"Entertainers" like the late Morton Downey Jr, Rush Limbaugh, and Al Sharpton shouldn't be fired any more than Jerry Springer should be. They are merely giving a large segment of America what they want. Of course, the judgement of any company which advertises on such shows should be seriously questioned.
 
"Entertainers" like the late Morton Downey Jr, Rush Limbaugh, and Al Sharpton shouldn't be fired any more than Jerry Springer should be. They are merely giving a large segment of America what they want. Of course, the judgement of any company which advertises on such shows should be seriously questioned.

I think saying "they should be fired" is also saying "Americans shouldn't be entertained by this kind of material".
 
My cable set top box allows me to change the channels. That's why I don't watch Springer any more than I watch Rush Limbaugh or Al Sharpton.

Censorship is a great thing just as long as you are the censor. The problem occurs when it is just about anybody else.
 
He was pretty fun on Boston Legal.
 
Back
Top Bottom