Annex asks...Best City Skyline?

Most Impressive City Skyline?

  • Hong Kong

    Votes: 39 34.5%
  • New York

    Votes: 29 25.7%
  • Dubai

    Votes: 4 3.5%
  • Tokyo

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shanghai

    Votes: 7 6.2%
  • Chicago

    Votes: 13 11.5%
  • Toronto

    Votes: 9 8.0%
  • Annex, you well endowed individual, you forgot ___!

    Votes: 12 10.6%

  • Total voters
    113
Looks like something from A Clockwork Orange.
 
the following remind me very much of the movie Godwynn psoted in "ask people from another country 2" :)

my town:

Spoiler :










skyscrapers forbidden by city ordinance ;)
 
Is that Munchen or is my memory playing tricks on me? :D

And why/how are skyscrapers forbidden?

it is Munich/München. afaik no new building within the city centre is allowed to be higher than the roof (lower part?) of the Frauenkirche (the one with the two towers and round tops). no new building anywhere in the city is allowed to be higher than 100 metres (height of the Frauenkirche towers). why? because it ain't pretty...
 
Minneapolis - singificantly larger metro area than Vancouver (over three times the size of Calgary). Looks decent:
Spoiler :


But someone threw up!
Googlia
Your theory is sound but Minneapolis is not a good example of it as it's downtown is actually pretty vibrant. Dallas or Atlanta would be a better example. Also that google maps photo is 7 years old, the housing bubble filled in about 3/4 of those parking lots with soon to be dirt cheap luxury condos.
 
I didn't think the New York pics in here were good enough.

Spoiler :


Spoiler :


Spoiler :


Future Midtwon

Spoiler :


Future Downtown

Spoiler :
 
Your theory is sound but Minneapolis is not a good example of it as it's downtown is actually pretty vibrant. Dallas or Atlanta would be a better example. Also that google maps photo is 7 years old, the housing bubble filled in about 3/4 of those parking lots with soon to be dirt cheap luxury condos.

I believe you that Minneapolis is one of the relatively better American cities, which is why I used it. Houston or Dallas just wouldn't be fair. Twin cities are supposed to be nice, from what I hear.

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Vancouver had more dense, inner city residential development than Minneapolis, Houston, and Dallas combined. In fact, condos squeezed out office space to such an extent, that I think there is a net outflow of commuters from downtown in the morning.

PS. Here is me excited about dirt cheap condos all over North America for the next 6 or 7 years or whatever. Who knows where one might end up for work.

EDIT: Hands down, the worst for that is Atlanta: http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&ie=UTF8&ll=33.754531,-84.39178&spn=0.027938,0.055618&t=k&z=15

That freeway has like 23 lanes. Who knows, maybe its a nice place to live... perhaps I would have to be there for a while to really judge.
 
That freeway has like 23 lanes.

Nah, I think it's only eight lanes on each side.

Who knows, maybe its a nice place to live... perhaps I would have to be there for a while to really judge.

You would.

But you'd probably come to the same conclusion.

The city is trying to work on that, I think... but yeah, I don't plan on staying here after school.

The skyline is really pretty, if I ever get a camera...
 
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Vancouver had more dense, inner city residential development than Minneapolis, Houston, and Dallas combined. In fact, condos squeezed out office space to such an extent, that I think there is a net outflow of commuters from downtown in the morning.
Vancouver is certainly more dense than Minneapolis in the inner city but it is largely a function of geography. Vancouver is hemed in by the sea on one side and mountains on the other, this puts land at a premium and leads to high density development, Minneapolis on the other hand has relatively flat land for hundreds of miles in all directions and as a result land is cheap. You can buy a studio condo in inner city Minneapolis for $75,000. One situation provides a great cityscape but at a high social cost due to the cost of living, the other is better for social justice but at the price of a less urban feel to the city.
 
Out of all the poll options I like the Chi-Town skyline the best. I stick to the classics, and Chicago was the first to go big.

However, I've gotta rep my hometow-...wait. My actual hometown has no skyline.

So I guess I'll go with Portland OR!







Sobieski, you should try your little Canadian analysis on Portland, I'm sure you'd approve.:)
 
Top Bottom