Trading city in GMR is broken anyway, because the city is auto annexed. So I'm not against banning it, just if it's mentioned earlier like any cash trade with AI is banned, I will definitely obey the rules. Or should turn need to revert, it should be brought into discussion immediately once I have done that as I thought it's just a matter of time and taking cities by force is actually better in managing unhappiness.
But the war part of CiV, I think it's not fair to discourage it in all games given all the UA and UUs are designed around that. I hate to go mass destruction of other player's civ as well, but it is one way of gaining advantage. War path was determined by the dynamics of this particular game, and if I did not take advantage of the Russian war machine, the game is not played optimally on my part, for which I will feel more guilty as human players are here in MP because of flawed SP AI.
Diplomacy certainly is another fun part of these games, but I felt I have messed up in too many occasions so I think it's not the best option for me.
But the war part of CiV, I think it's not fair to discourage it in all games given all the UA and UUs are designed around that. I hate to go mass destruction of other player's civ as well, but it is one way of gaining advantage. War path was determined by the dynamics of this particular game, and if I did not take advantage of the Russian war machine, the game is not played optimally on my part, for which I will feel more guilty as human players are here in MP because of flawed SP AI.
Diplomacy certainly is another fun part of these games, but I felt I have messed up in too many occasions so I think it's not the best option for me.