Anarcomu
King
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2022
- Messages
- 610
Looks like an oversight to me, they behave like forts which do not remove forests in vanilla but do remove forest in VP. I suppose, then, that Kasbah are meant to remove forests in the first place.
VP Text & Tooltip Reports for all Users!
- Thread starter Enginseer
- Start date
Kasbahs were designed with the idea that they don't remove any feature (at all) afaik.
Kasbah/Kunas/Brazilwood Camps/Polders do not remove features.
Ekis/Hacienda/Moais/Chateau/Feitorias/Terrace Farms/Encampments/Siheyuans/Ordos remove features.
I will make note of this in the Kasbah, Kuna, Brazilwood Camps, and Polders entry.
The rest are I think you guys know they remove features.
Ekis/Hacienda/Moais/Chateau/Feitorias/Terrace Farms/Encampments/Siheyuans/Ordos remove features.
I will make note of this in the Kasbah, Kuna, Brazilwood Camps, and Polders entry.
The rest are I think you guys know they remove features.
Last edited:
You may or may not care butCool, two different icons for Land and sea trade routes.
World Wonders in future versions should have a pretty icon in front of it (why... oh i don't know...)
TadhgEomonn
Chieftain
Version Number: 3.6.2
Screenshot/Key Words:
Suggestion: Mouse-over text suggests that Robert I Bruce (player) has the most original 
Capitals. This is false. Suleimon lost his Capital to Morroco's Ahmad al-Mansur. So, Ahmad controls the most original Capitals.
Not sure if this is a test problem or a Civ/VP bug.
Screenshot/Key Words:
Capitals. This is false. Suleimon lost his Capital to Morroco's Ahmad al-Mansur. So, Ahmad controls the most original Capitals.Not sure if this is a test problem or a Civ/VP bug.
TadhgEomonn
Chieftain
Version Number: 3.6.2
Screenshot/Key Words:
Suggestion: This message's phrasing is awkward and distracting.
Screenshot/Key Words:
Suggestion: This message's phrasing is awkward and distracting.
GitHub issue since I don't know what's being handled here... maybe Robert I Bruce (you) have vassalized a couple of Civilizations...?Version Number: 3.6.2
Screenshot/Key Words:View attachment 663422Suggestion: Mouse-over text suggests that Robert I Bruce (player) has the most original
Not sure if this is a test problem or a Civ/VP bug.
I mean that's just someone needing to rephrase it and it'll get pulled. I'm not really interested in those type of things.
Wire Service and other building of the same type.
The text is not clear :
The text is not clear :
- +1
Culture in City for every City-State Friend, and additionally +1 
Science for every Ally.
- +1 Culture in City for every City-State Friend or Ally, and additionally +1 Science for every Ally.
- or +1 Culture in City for every City-State at least Friend, and additionally +1 Science for every Ally.
Choosing belief made easier (your "AI" will recommend 3 based on your start and all that)
You must really love these beliefs huh India?
Disabled by default if you disable basic tooltip help in your options.
Score visibility also disabled. Modders would need to enable it in a boolean in ChoosePantheonPopup.lua and ChooseReligionPopup.lua for them to work.
Last edited:
Nice seeing they're actually prioritizing "yields on growth" beliefs instead of de-prioritizing now. Council of Elders could have a non-zero score now that their religion actually spreads automatically. I wonder if it works on owned cities on founding.
Choosing belief made easier (your "AI" will recommend some based on your start and all that)
You must really love these beliefs huh India?
Disabled if you disable basic tooltip help in your options.
N.Core
1st Class of Neoa
I'm not really sure that giving each belief a score is a good idea.
Because it will ruin your experience since you're getting spoiled by the game.
This stuff is supposedly decided by the player to figure out which belief is the best for them and not let the game dictates it.
If you insist on adding this "QoL," I suggest hiding the score and replacing it with a vague description instead, like "Recommended," "Great," "Good," etc.
This stuff is great for developing beliefs, that's for sure.
Because it will ruin your experience since you're getting spoiled by the game.
This stuff is supposedly decided by the player to figure out which belief is the best for them and not let the game dictates it.
If you insist on adding this "QoL," I suggest hiding the score and replacing it with a vague description instead, like "Recommended," "Great," "Good," etc.
This stuff is great for developing beliefs, that's for sure.
ZetaLambdaNinja
Chieftain
- Joined
- May 24, 2023
- Messages
- 18
Version: 3.6.2
Screenshot/Key Words:
Suggestion: While I wouldn't say the belief summaries under building beliefs like "Orders" is completely useless--it does, after all, indicate that the belief enables the purchase of a structure with faith--I'd say it's nearly useless in its current state. It would be helpful if either (a) the building information displayed in the corresponding entry in the "Buildings" section is also displayed here, or (b) users could click on the word "Orders" in the description to be taken to that entry.
IMO, (a) is more useful for people who want to look through the civilopedia to compare beliefs when they don't have the "Found a Religion" menu available (I do this sometimes.)
Screenshot/Key Words:
Suggestion: While I wouldn't say the belief summaries under building beliefs like "Orders" is completely useless--it does, after all, indicate that the belief enables the purchase of a structure with faith--I'd say it's nearly useless in its current state. It would be helpful if either (a) the building information displayed in the corresponding entry in the "Buildings" section is also displayed here, or (b) users could click on the word "Orders" in the description to be taken to that entry.
IMO, (a) is more useful for people who want to look through the civilopedia to compare beliefs when they don't have the "Found a Religion" menu available (I do this sometimes.)
ZetaLambdaNinja
Chieftain
- Joined
- May 24, 2023
- Messages
- 18
Version Number: 3.6.2
Screenshot/Key Words:
The "Council of Elders" belief states that its bonuses "scale gradually" based on the number of cities following the religion.
Suggestion: What exactly does "scaling gradually" mean in this context?
Screenshot/Key Words:
The "Council of Elders" belief states that its bonuses "scale gradually" based on the number of cities following the religion.
Suggestion: What exactly does "scaling gradually" mean in this context?
The formula is too complicated to be put into words. All I can say is that it's not linear.
Esprit de Corps : When you conquer a City, gain [...] and a temporary 40% boost to&
in every city scaling with the conquered city's population.
How long is 'temporary' and how does it scale with the conquered city's population?
/2 *InstantYieldModifier, with the minimum being 1.So a 4 population will give you 2 turns of a 40% boost.
"The resource just isn't there yet." We can't do this since it won't reflect the building when you Civilopedia "Order" and "Orders." If you civilopedia the singular form, you get the building. If you civilopedia the plural form, you get the belief.
Just gonna word it like how a resourcetype would word it.Wire Service and other building of the same type.
The text is not clear :
It would be better:
- +1
- +1
- or +1
City-State Friend Bonus: +1 Culture each. City-State Ally Bonus: +1 Culture and Science each.OK, not my favorite choice but at least it's perfectly clear.
