300 AD: Founding new cities

Where shall we found new cities ?

  • RF's settler should found a city at C2

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • RF's settler should found a city at C3a

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • RF's settler should found a city at C3b

    Votes: 2 28.6%
  • RF's settler should found a city at C3c

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • RF's settler should do something else (specify)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • One of the settlers near Igloria should found city at C5 ASAP (recommended)

    Votes: 6 85.7%
  • One of the settlers near Igloria should found city at C6 ASAP

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • Founding C5/C6 is a bad idea, do something else (specify)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7

TheViking

The world is not enough
Joined
Mar 31, 2001
Messages
776
Location
The N hemisphere near fire and ice
We now have the opportunity to expand east and west. The included maps show IMO the best city sites but feel free to suggest other sites. In particular I think we should we should found C5 ASAP; it's on the same landmass as the Aztecs and probably Zulus and thus enables us to demand (and probably get) tribute from the Aztecs and Zulus before republic. The probability of getting tribute increases if we build a few military units before demanding tribute.

Of the sites in the west I think C3b and C3c are better than C3a. In theory C3a might be better but quick early growth is better and the forest makes that difficult (the city would either grow slowly or founding it would be delayed by the need to chop down some trees before founding a city).

The maps below show the sites in question:
dc3_300ad_1.jpg

dc3_300ad_2.jpg
 
Went for the C2 option, because I'm not a fan of having desert in the city radius. Wennt with recommended for Igloria settler.
 
OK for the c5 site.

if we have 2 settlers, I hardly recommand to found on c3a, after begining to unforest (m or i ?).
if only 1 is ready to settl, then c3b, with(2 whales (the fish can be use by another city later)
 
Back
Top Bottom