Current: When you buy or sell votes, those votes are committed in the next congress. Only through war or if the proposal is removed can those votes be unlocked and usable again. You can only buy these votes through "per turn" things like resources and GPT.
Proposal: Allow buy/sell votes to use lump sum options (cities, lump gold, etc). However, these votes are locked for the next congress no matter what. Even through war or other options, a vote bought is a vote locked. If that congress option is no longer available, the votes are abstained in the next congress (aka the original owner does not get them back).
Rationale: It is actually very expensive to buy votes, meaning that per turn resources are often not enough (especially if you are playing with a very low GPT count even if you have lots of instant gold). Further, 95% of the time the vote IS a single lump sum buy, it is not an ongoing benefit like a resource is, and it should be treated as a lump sum option. The only reason its not is because of the rare circumstance where something can cancel the commitment. By removing any way the commitment can be broken, we can formalize as a true lump sum option, and then allow those kinds of trades. This should make vote trading more practical.
Proposal: Allow buy/sell votes to use lump sum options (cities, lump gold, etc). However, these votes are locked for the next congress no matter what. Even through war or other options, a vote bought is a vote locked. If that congress option is no longer available, the votes are abstained in the next congress (aka the original owner does not get them back).
Rationale: It is actually very expensive to buy votes, meaning that per turn resources are often not enough (especially if you are playing with a very low GPT count even if you have lots of instant gold). Further, 95% of the time the vote IS a single lump sum buy, it is not an ongoing benefit like a resource is, and it should be treated as a lump sum option. The only reason its not is because of the rare circumstance where something can cancel the commitment. By removing any way the commitment can be broken, we can formalize as a true lump sum option, and then allow those kinds of trades. This should make vote trading more practical.
Last edited by a moderator: