How does this work with defensive pacts?
If you have a bloc of civs A-B-C, and D-E-F, and F launches a nuke...
- (Presumably the defensive pact is cancelled first? Might want to detail this in the proposal.)
- D and E declare on F, per the resolution.
- Does D get a backstabber penalty for declaring on F, having just been a Friend/Defensive Pact partner?
I guess you could have the technical process be:
F declares war on everyone else, not the other way around. That should clear up the D-E-? part of this scenario. Then does F get backstabber penalties in addition to the nuclear penalties?
And actually, following through with this line of thought, it seems like it might be really frustrating for a defensive bloc, who might be relying on F's nukes as protection from A-B-C, would be forced to turn on them as a cause of a resolution they didn't even agree to. It's the same problem as sanctioning your ally, when you'd rather just also be sanctioned with them and continue trading on the side.