M
moof
Guest
We have read some thoughts about the advanced City hut here,
but we have a very specific question about it.
Whenever we have find a Hut only a space or two from a terrific city spot,
we are hopeing for an Advanced City.
Our thinking is that we can disband the city into a settler and move over
onto the great spot much faster than making a settler in a far away city
and moving the settler to the site by the Hut.
The Pros :
1. There is the increase in research while the settler is being built.
2. There is no loss of population suffered in the city that would have had to
supply a settler for the great site.
3. Most times the settler from the Disbanded Hut city can be in place sooner than a
settler built in some other existing city.
Cons:
1. Giving up the other possible hut goodies such as a unit or money
that building a city beside a hut will insure.
2. If you are already up against the riot factor a new city can cause
unhappiness problems.
So are we missing something because the advanced city hut just one square
from a great city site looks like a good deal to us.
Especially as in a recent game where we had Mountains with Iron for the citizen
to work while we built the new settler, the settler was built in very little time.
------------------
TTFNFm & MTFBWY moof
" Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former. " - Albert Einstein
but we have a very specific question about it.
Whenever we have find a Hut only a space or two from a terrific city spot,
we are hopeing for an Advanced City.
Our thinking is that we can disband the city into a settler and move over
onto the great spot much faster than making a settler in a far away city
and moving the settler to the site by the Hut.
The Pros :
1. There is the increase in research while the settler is being built.
2. There is no loss of population suffered in the city that would have had to
supply a settler for the great site.
3. Most times the settler from the Disbanded Hut city can be in place sooner than a
settler built in some other existing city.
Cons:
1. Giving up the other possible hut goodies such as a unit or money
that building a city beside a hut will insure.
2. If you are already up against the riot factor a new city can cause
unhappiness problems.
So are we missing something because the advanced city hut just one square
from a great city site looks like a good deal to us.
Especially as in a recent game where we had Mountains with Iron for the citizen
to work while we built the new settler, the settler was built in very little time.
------------------
TTFNFm & MTFBWY moof
" Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former. " - Albert Einstein