I wonder what the standard was, say 18 years ago.Twenty years ago, we werent at war. Duh.
I wonder what the standard was, say 18 years ago.Twenty years ago, we werent at war. Duh.
I love these opportunities to show you how ignorant you are of things military. The NPR good enough for you?.
Twenty years ago, we werent at war. Duh.
A singular case, while problematic, isnt necessarily indicative of a huge problem.
Um, this says nothing about him making house calls in combat zones. Try again with your google search and ad hom attacks.
So being "at war" makes it OK to send drugged out soldiers into the field?
Didn't you just try to apologize for this being a rare occurance without any actual knowledge of how frequently it actually occurs? So which is it? A rare occurance, or something that frequently happens when we are "at war"?
If you actually bothered to listen to the NPR broadcast you would find that he was assigned to a "combat stress clinic" such as the one where the soldier freaked out and killed people. He wasn't actually in a combat zone at all.
OMG. Are you so unfamiliar with things military that you dont understand what 'the field' is? Seeing 'soldiers in the field' precisely means making house calls..
Keep replying because that credibility hole you are digging just keeps getting deeper and deeper.
Again, the Colonel cited in the article is a doctor who is actually an expert on this particular subject while it would appear you would not be.Again, its up to the doctors on site to evaluate who and who is not mission capable. .
And yes, being at war would indicate a much higher use of such meds to treat soldiers issues and keep them effective.
I have merely pointed out the obvious as I did earlier. The story states that narcotics have shot up dramatically from 2003 to 2008 for example. If one comprehends the increase in the number of casualties in those same years that *might* explain the increase in painkillers the military uses.
According to data from a U. S. Army mental-health survey released last year, about 12 percent of soldiers in Iraq and 15 percent of those in Afghanistan reported taking antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, or sleeping pills. Prescriptions for painkillers have also skyrocketed. Data from the Department of Defense last fall showed that as of September 2007, prescriptions for narcotics for active-duty troops had risen to almost 50,000 a month, compared with about 33,000 a month in October 2003, not long after the Iraq war began.
Not when doesn't leave the crisis center to see his patients. Once again, actually listen to what you think must be proof. It won't so embarrassing.
Actually, it was comparing 2003 to 2007, after US wounded and killed had already dropped dramatically...
Do you have any clue how many people have been wounded or killed in those bases?.
You are so utterly clueless..
Do you? Furthermore, do you know what the phrase "house call" actually means?>
As I understand it, that is where we now send druggies.Let me ask you one in return. Do you know what a 'combat zone' is? I explained it a few posts up. Do you understand what a combat zone is now?
As I understand it, that is where we now send druggies.
WIN.
As I recall, mobboss, we seemed to manage fine in WW2 without all these psych drugs and prescription mixes. Morphine - good for painkiller. You didn't take morphine and then go into combat.
Shell ShockWe know much more about PTSD and TBI type of injuries today than they could ever imagine in the 40s.
Just because "they" may know a fair amount about what they're doing certainly doesn't mean it's in the best interest of the soldiers. Especially not for 4,296 of them (not counting suicide or accidental death, IIRC).
"They" will do whatever they can to keep them out there, counter low morale & attempt to block out the side effects of war (insomnia, depression, etc.).
First & foremost it's in the best interest to keep as many soldiers as possible. Blocking out troublesome symptoms until wartime is over is ideal (from a commander's perspective).It's in their best interests to keep as many soldiers as fit and healthy as possible.
First & foremost it's in the best interest to keep as many soldiers as possible. Blocking out troublesome symptoms until wartime is over is ideal (from a commander's perspective).