Originally posted by kittenOFchaos
Did the Aztecs etc have swords?
I'm just wondering because in the book of Mormon they tribe in "Central America" had swords apparently around 60 B.C and indeed there are alot of references to swords.
Book of mormon or moron...a chap call Moroni in the book, fascinating
The book of mormon is really the proof that you can sell the biggest bull**** to people.
It's not true at all. Beside the fact that metal weapons were COMPLETELY unknown in the Americas, we don't have a cronology that goes further back than ~1300, except for the Maya area, where we can set exact dates until maybe 200AD. Before that we rely on the guessings of the archeologists and C14-method.
Neither archeological science nor C14-method were available to Joseph Smith...
But there is a vivid tradition of jewish descendance theories foir the Indians from the 16th century onwards. One built up on the other, until blunder, false statements, wrong translations and weird bible interpretation culminated in Smith's bulls*it. I'm currently working on a paper on those theories, so I ought to know

.
But some explanations to the term "sword" in connection to the Aztecs:
The first writers about America had to describe a completely unknown world, so at first they had to describe it in the old concepts.
Columbus wrote that he had seen nightingales, though there arent such in the Americas. He simply used it as an understandable pattern for what he saw.
Gomara, Cortes' apologetic writer, called the Aztec temples "Mosques", because he wanted to accentuate the rightfulness of their destruction, the treatment of the Indians and present the Conquista as the legitimate heir of the Reconquista.
Jaguars were called "tigers", because until you could make it clear to european , what a Jaguar was, you had to use a more familiar term. There is tons of similar examples, the sword being one.
The "sword" was probably the
Maquahuitl, which actually resembles more a war club...