Babylon (Modular)

strategyonly

C2C Supreme Commander
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
20,994
Location
MN
These are comprised from Diversica & Varietas Delectat with very very little changes. In some the the civs i could not use all the units so i changed just a few things around.:p I tried to be true to Civ4. Changes would be nice if you have good ideas.

I made this awhile ago, but never got around to putting them here.

Download: http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=11537
 
No new LHs at this time.


credits:

Spoiler :
Zerver /bernie14 / danrell / avain/mamba/
Roamty/Darque/AlazkanAssassin/GarretSidzaka/Andrew_JayQuueg/
meatwad4289/Kael and FfH2 Team/CivGoldTeam/Duel/Chugginator/civmansam
Supa/ArneoKerdarun/Zuul/MeteorPunch/Rabbit,White/Chalid/bmarnz/
Aranor/Wyz_sub10/snafusmith/C.Roland/woodelf/GarretSidzaka/
Robo Magic Man/TheBladeRoden/krowtrobot/seZereth/PSYX/
J_Period/Ploeperpengel/Chamaedrys/nautil/Hadrean/sepamu92/sharick/
ggganz/Italicus/ArdRaeiss/Hell's Angel/McGlocklinMA/mirtan/
Cafegio/korvgubben/The Conquests/Chiyu/hrochland/Khai/
Swarog/Walter Hawkwood/Fëanor/Nickolai/Axel/Mozza/bmarnz/
Bakuel/Gedemon/Grave/Zebra 9/bhiita/GeneralMatt/Houman/
Edgecrusher/timboobaa/Polycrates/FuzzyWuzzyBunny/asioasioasio/
siam/jojoweb/lamppost4/Sevo/Quueg/meatwad4289/Dale/avain/
dutchking/Psychic_Llamas/frenchman/PW90/GigaNerd/Dr. Funkshadow/
GIR/esnaz/winddelay/Amra/esnaz/
 
How about Nebuchadnezzar II?
 
Sargon is Sumerian, not Babylonian.
 
No, he's Akkadian :p

The Akkadians were a precursor to the Babylonians (Amorites) who were Semitic, like the Babylonians. It would be way closer than putting Charlemagne as Holy Roman Empire :rolleyes:
 
I would say Nebuchadnezzar would be better than Sargon. After the Chaldeans took control of Babylonia, Nebuchadnezzar the Second influenced culture and power. He was the one who had the Hanging Gardens built and he had the Grand entrance build that said "I am the all powerful and noble Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon"
 
No, he's Akkadian :p

He is actually listed in the Sumerian Kings list, which was a list of Sumerian leaders written by the Sumerians themselves. But technically he wasn't Sumerian and was Semitic, but the Sumerians themselves were becoming Semiticised, so I'd put him in as a Sumerian ruler rather than Babylonian.
 
Top Bottom