Bill O'Reilly, Rev Wright = David Duke

pfft... flame warriors and their legal disclaimers.

:rolleyes:

I'm so terribly sorry to disappoint you with a rational thought process that precludes me from glossing over entire segments of the population with broad, generalized terms.

I'm so terribly sorry that I'm not actually racist and believe that what's true for a portion of a group is not true for it's whole.

Here, how's this?

ALL BLUE PEOPLE ARE DUMB, ILLITERATE AND ARE LAZY!

There, is that better?
 
Jews... don't have black skin.some do

Jews... don't have the history of slavery, or Jim Crow laws, here in America.not all blacks did either

Jews... have a unifying religion that allows more business contacts between them.And blacks have black only clubs. Even in congress. The government even gives out constrution to black only companies.

Jews... have a history of wealth going back to the days when the began to loan money with interest, something forbidden by Christianity and Islam.

Jews and blacks aint the same thing.
No they aren't. Well unless they happen to be black and jew.
 
So because blacks are poor its a failed ethnic group? Or is it that the people are failing them selves. A few wealthy people? There a lot of rich black people out there. You know the ones who used those black only scholarships to get ahead. The ones who did good in school. The ones who tried.

Oh and there are more poor whites then rich whites.

Well, when a good percentage of your ethnic group is in the dumps, then I think you've got a major problem. There are only a few wealthy black people, that is a fact. Not 25% of the black population makes more than 80K, you cannot dispute that. There are only a few of those black scholarships, just like any other scholarship.

here are some numbers.

http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/income_wealth/002484.html

I inflated the number of poor black people sorry. White people to account for 44% of poor people, but they also amount for 66% of the population. One would think in a fair world they would amount to 66% as well instead of 44%.
 
I'm so terribly sorry to disappoint you with a rational thought process that precludes me from glossing over entire segments of the population with broad, generalized terms.

I'm so terribly sorry that I'm not actually racist and believe that what's true for a portion of a group is true for it's whole.

Here, how's this?

ALL BLUE PEOPLE ARE DUMB, ILLITERATE AND ARE LAZY!

There, is that better?

You think you are the first person in the world to resort to asking about be-be's kids and welfare when talking about black people?

You think saying "some" makes your point any better?

Well what about "some" of those greedy hook-nosed jews?

What about "some" of those child-rapist hispanics?

notice how using "some" shields me from being called a racist? Isn't that neat?
 
Just saying that America is a liberal enough society to make religion a non-issue. Plus who knows a Jew by looking at them, I don't. I think you can see if someone is black. (sometimes you can't, I'm not kidding). There are only a few poor jews because most are well educated.

I was responding to Neo. I'm not sure his response to me made any sense whatsoever. It seems everything must be qualified as "white" or "black" to him - no designation can do without it.
 
:shrug:

tell ecofarm, he seems to think poor jews dont exist.

of course, them being black, just bolsters the point that being black is a lot harder than being Jew.

No he said he had never met one.

Is being black when you are the majority still making it harder because your black?

Being black isn't harder then being any other colour in America. There aren't some majical forces holding black people back.
 
Knowledge is the key to power and the ability to claw yourself out of poverty. The sad thing is that the amount of knowledge that is needed to claw yourself out is a very large sum. Easily achieved by going to the library, but who in inner city Detroit would want to do that?

That's their own fault, no one else's.

4 children is not a fact at all.

I was referring to the "welfare mommas." I obviously did not mean that to include the entirety of the black population. :rolleyes:
 
I was responding to Neo. I'm not sure his response to me made any sense whatsoever. It seems everything must be qualified as "white" or "black" to him - no designation can do without it.

Well, that's what the argument is about isn't it?
 
I was responding to Neo. I'm not sure his response to me made any sense whatsoever. It seems everything must be qualified as "white" or "black" to him - no designation can do without it.

It'll wear off, then you'll realize, that the media is making a big deal out of nothing, trying to hang Obama with guilt by association. Then you'll realize you've been hoodwinked, and all this arguing on the internet was easily crushed by the simple assertion it is guilt by association.

It may work on the lame brain tv heads in the vast american mind-wastes, but not here, where some modicum of intelligence is required for discourse.
 
No he said he had never met one.

Is being black when you are the majority still making it harder because your black?

Being black isn't harder then being any other colour in America. There aren't some majical forces holding black people back.

Well, there are some undercurrents in America but in most places racism is mostly a non-issue. The problem isn't being black, it's being poor. The black poor kid, the white poor kid, the asian poor kid, and the mexican poor kid are all pretty much screwed. Just that there is a higher percentage of black poor kids in the black ethnic group than of white poor kids in the white ethnic group.
 
There aren't some majical forces holding black people back.

There are real, sociological and economic forces, not majical.

Of course, I have already stated many of them, so I'll not entertain any more arguments about them. there are plenty of posts in this thread already that explain them quite eloquently.
 
Some of them do now yes.

Are they well off? I looked at one of these arguments that seems to be over the exact same premise of race and Gecko1 said something like. African immigrants come to America with a good schooling, so I guess that, that translates to richer Ethiopian Jews. Knowledge can drag you out of any situation, but if you're rich enough to immigrate to America you shouldn't end up poor.
 
:shrug:

tell ecofarm, he seems to think poor jews dont exist.

Yea, I didn't know about Ethiopian Jews :eyeroll:

Even with a change of context, the fact that Jews are in Ethopia does not prove that people are poor because they are minorities. See? Lose the context and the whole point is mute. But hey! Don't let that stand the the way of proving me wrong again!

of course, them being black, just bolsters the point that being black is a lot harder than being Jew.
Ok, now I don't think you're serious at all.
 
Yea, I didn't know about Ethiopian Jews :eyeroll:

Even with a change of context, the fact that Jews are in Ethopia does not prove that people are poor because they are minorities. See? Lose the context and the whole point is mute. But hey! Don't let that stand the the way of proving me wrong again!


Ok, now I don't think you're serious at all.

Read my post above. well, actually the post above the one above. The post before the post I made before.

Well, there are some undercurrents in America but in most places racism is mostly a non-issue. The problem isn't being black, it's being poor. The black poor kid, the white poor kid, the asian poor kid, and the mexican poor kid are all pretty much screwed. Just that there is a higher percentage of black poor kids in the black ethnic group than of white poor kids in the white ethnic group.
 
You think you are the first person in the world to resort to asking about be-be's kids and welfare when talking about black people?

I was using those situations as an example for why some groups of people fail.

You think saying "some" makes your point any better?

Well what about "some" of those greedy hook-nosed jews?

What about "some" of those child-rapist hispanics?

notice how using "some" shields me from being called a racist? Isn't that neat?

:rolleyes:

Your examples and what I've said are worlds apart.

So let's see here, if I generalize and stereotype an entire group by saying what's true for a portion is true for the whole, I am a racist.

If I don't generalize and specifically indicate what problems a portion of a population is having, I am a racist hiding behind a disclaimer.

I'm damned if I do, and damned if I don't.
 
Yea, I didn't know about Ethiopian Jews :eyeroll:

Even with a change of context, the fact that Jews are in Ethopia does not prove that people are poor because they are minorities. See? Lose the context and the whole point is mute. But hey! Don't let that stand the the way of proving me wrong again!


Ok, now I don't think you're serious at all.

I wasn't serious when you started talking about non-poor jews.

jews and blacks aint the same thing. Sorry.
 
Then you'll realize you've been hoodwinked, and all this arguing on the internet was easily crushed by the simple assertion it is guilt by association.

It may work on the lame brain tv heads in the vast american mind-wastes, but not here, where some modicum of intelligence is required for discourse.

I don't suppose that you will realize that this about about guilt by:

1) Poor judge of character
2) Choosing to associate, for 20 years, with the likes of Wright
3) Lying about what he knew
4) "Never being proud of her country before"

No-one is trying to indict Obama on racism charges, but he is guilty of 1-3 above and his wife is guilty of 4. You cannot change that by crying "guilt by association!" or "Bush Nazi!"

jews and blacks aint the same thing. Sorry.

I never said they were. I said they were both minorities and only one group is poor; therefor, minority = poor fails.
 
Back
Top Bottom