I found this review of civ v:
http://gameinformer.com/games/civil...e/2010/09/17/reforged-into-a-masterpiece.aspx
The reviewer, despite giving it a 9.75 rating, mentions this in his conclusions on the right hand side: "One horrible mistake in diplomacy is the only blemish on the interface. Everything else is perfect."
Specifically (in the full review) he's apparently referring to this:
"...but it's a pain in the rear to fully take advantage of because the interface lacks a good way to track your incoming and outgoing resources and gold. Every time I want to sell off some cotton to Montezuma, for instance, I have to manually count how many I'm collecting myself, how much I'm getting in trade from other nations, and how many I'm already trading away. Stupid. ..."
Can anyone confirm this detail? Or is it just something he missed somewhere?
http://gameinformer.com/games/civil...e/2010/09/17/reforged-into-a-masterpiece.aspx
The reviewer, despite giving it a 9.75 rating, mentions this in his conclusions on the right hand side: "One horrible mistake in diplomacy is the only blemish on the interface. Everything else is perfect."
Specifically (in the full review) he's apparently referring to this:
"...but it's a pain in the rear to fully take advantage of because the interface lacks a good way to track your incoming and outgoing resources and gold. Every time I want to sell off some cotton to Montezuma, for instance, I have to manually count how many I'm collecting myself, how much I'm getting in trade from other nations, and how many I'm already trading away. Stupid. ..."
Can anyone confirm this detail? Or is it just something he missed somewhere?