I know there were a number of people that spoke out against the speed of the last poll, however the citizen's initiative requires that this sort of poll operate on majorities, not pluralities, it also mandates runoffs in order to reach a majority decision.
Because none of the options (including none of the above) reached majority status another vote is required.
Also I would like to suggest that we change the citizen's initiative, we should modify it such that plurality decisions are acceptable, in this way we can select names without endless run-off, as seems to be happening here, and if none of the choices are acceptable a return to discussion will occur sooner. However that's a different discussion.
The poll will last 3 days and there will be no run-off after this one, either we'll have a name or we'll have followed the initiative and can return to discussion.
Because none of the options (including none of the above) reached majority status another vote is required.
Also I would like to suggest that we change the citizen's initiative, we should modify it such that plurality decisions are acceptable, in this way we can select names without endless run-off, as seems to be happening here, and if none of the choices are acceptable a return to discussion will occur sooner. However that's a different discussion.
The poll will last 3 days and there will be no run-off after this one, either we'll have a name or we'll have followed the initiative and can return to discussion.