City placement: 3rd city and beyond

Noldodan

2 years of waiting...
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
1,747
Location
Gondolin!
We uncovered a lot of territory this chat. As the following maps show, I have spotted 9 areas in which we should settle eventually. Areas 1-7 are sufficiently close that any one of them could be settled next. So, where should we settle? The top 5 options or so will be polled, and settled in the polling order. Now, I know what you're going to say: What about the Iron? Well, that's simple. As soon as we spot the iron, we'll settle there, interrupting the established order.

DG5_city3_7.JPG


DG5_city3_5.JPG


DG5_city3_6.JPG
 
I am in the prosess of drafting multiple proposals regarding both the Southern Borderlands (Sectors 5, 6, and 7), the Fertile Arid Zona (Sector 3), and the Northern Frontier (Sectors 1 and 2).

I am of the personal opinion that, while Sectors 8 and 9 are good sites indeed, we should first contain Babylonian settlement and secure our Southern Resources. Further, my upcomming proposal for Sector 3 would crowd on Sector 4, just to warn you now.

Proposals forthcoming.
 
I think we should settle sector 3 ASAP. With a granary, this could start pumping out settlers very quickly. Sector 6 also looks vital, as we do not want those horses to go to Babylon. Sector 2 is good for a city, but we do not have to settle there as quickly as we would other places.

SaaM
 
Stuck_As_a_Mac said:
I think we should settle sector 3 ASAP. With a granary, this could start pumping out settlers very quickly. Sector 6 also looks vital, as we do not want those horses to go to Babylon. Sector 2 is good for a city, but we do not have to settle there as quickly as we would other places.

SaaM

I would settle in that order: Sector 3, sector 6, sector 5, sector 1 and then sector 2.

Sector 3 will probably double our settler output. It is the best place to settle for now.
 
I know I said something already, but I am stating my personal preferences:

Priority 1: Solidify a Border with Babylon and Secure the Gems and Horses. This covers Sectors 5, 6, and 7. I will be presenting a "Prefered Proposal" and an "Alternate Proposal" (EDIT: Epimethius' "Green" matched my "Alternate".)

Priority 2: The settler Factory in Sector 3. I will also submit a Proposal for this city as well as a general plan for the immediate area and the Near Northern Froniter.

Priority 3: Anything else.

If you wish for sector form: Under my Prefered Proposal: Sector 6, Sector 7, Sector 3, Sector 5, Sector 1, Anything Else (includes East of Sector 3).
 
Fier Canadien said:
I would settle in that order: Sector 3, sector 6, sector 5, sector 1 and then sector 2.

Sector 3 will probably double our settler output. It is the best place to settle for now.
I would like to second this opinion. :goodjob:
EDIT: The Northern frontier could wait a bit before we do these options.
 
1-4 all look like good places to settle but the horses should be our main priority. We should start with secter 6 so that we secure the horses. Then, we should settle somewhere in 5 for the gems. At that point, we can settle the land just east of us(secters 1-4).
EDIT: 7,8, and 9 are to far for us to think about now.
 
Sector 3 will not pump out settlers as fast as you think. It's to much food and to little production. Likely the city will reach size 4 before getting a settler out. Sector 2 would be a much better settler producer. The grassland as okay food production and it can be mined to increase production.
 
Honorable Domestic Minister:

I have drafted a proposal for the settlement of the areas classified as Sectors 6, 7, and 5 respectively.

I have enclosed a map of the locations of the cities and their radaii.

Note: I do not know the exact formula for Gold and shields on the City Square itself. I will edit the analysis if corrected.

Later tonight, I hope to come up with a Proposal for Sector 3. This is my primary perfered proposal. If the DA feels that the speed required to Settle Sectors 6 and 7 consecutively, I can present an alternate plan that basically merges Sectors 5 and 6, but reduces the Sector 7 City site.

---------Proposal is as follows-----------------------------

In this proposal, Cities 1 and 3 are on Hills by River while City 2 is on Plains with River.

City 1: Corresponds to sector 6. Secures the Horses and the Gemstones near the Bab Border.
City Site: 2/1/2, 2/1/3?
Pre-Temple:
1 Hill with Horses: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
1 Hill with River: 1/1/1. 1/2/2, 1/3/2
Total Pre-Temple: 4/3/4, 4/5/6, 4/7/7?

Post-Temple:
1 Hill with Horses: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
1 Lumbered Forest: 1/2/1, 2/1/2 (Requires chopping Down Trees), 2/1/2
1 Hill with River: 1/1/1. 1/2/2, 1/3/2

Final total: 4/4/3 (Size 2), 6/6/9 (Size 3), 6/8/10? (Size 3)

Because this would be considered a Ring 3 city, there would be some corruption.

Alternately, we could settle this city 1 Tile NW of this location. This would reduce Gold by 1 in all totals (4/4/2, 6/6/8, 6/8/9) and may put the Southern Gems at Risk unless the second settler is on the direct heels of the first.


City 2: Corresponds to sector 7. Secures the Nearby Cattle and serves as a Southern Settler Base for if we should pursue Sectors 8 and 9 as well as Babylonian Territory.
City Site: 2/1/2, 2/1/3?
Pre-Temple, All 8 Tiles:
1 Plains with Wheat (R): 2/1/1, 3/1/2, 4/1/2
1 Plains Cattle: 2/2/0, 3/2/1, 4/2/1
1 Forested Plains (R): 1/2/1, 1/2/2 OR 2/1/2 (with deforestation), 1/2/2 or 2/1/2
1 River Hill: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
1 Regular Plains: 1/1/0, 2/1/1, 2/1/1
2 Non-River Hills: 1/1/0, 1/2/1, 1/3/1
1 Mountain: 0/1/0, 0/2/1, 0/3/1
Sum, Max Size: 8/7/5 Size 4, 14/12/13 Size 7, 16/15/13 Size 8

Post-Temple:
Top 6 Visible Tiles:
1 Plains with Wheat (R): 2/1/1, 3/1/2, 4/1/2
2 Plains Cattle: 2/2/0, 3/2/1, 4/2/1
1 Gems Mountain (within City 1's Radius): 0/1/3, 0/2/4, 0/3/5
2 River Hills: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
Sum: 10/8/5, Size 5, >12 food

Top 12 Visible Tiles:
1 Plains with Wheat (R): 2/1/1, 3/1/2, 4/1/2
2 Plains Cattle: 2/2/0, 3/2/1, 4/2/1
1 Gems Mountain (within City 1's Radius, R): 0/1/3, 0/2/4, 0/3/5
3 Regular Plains: 1/1/0, 2/1/1, 2/1/1
1 Forested Plains (R): 1/2/1, 1/2/2 OR 2/1/2 (with deforestation), 1/2/2 or 2/1/2
2 River Hills: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
2 Non-River Hills: 1/1/0, 1/2/1, 1/3/1

Sum Developed: 22/18/21 Size 11, 26/25/24, All Top 12 Tiles Used

Again, this city will experience a good bit of corruption. However, with full Happiness and outside of Despotism, it'll be a good producer. It might even be in the running for a scratch Forbidden Palace should we wish for a Palace Jump.


City 3: Corresponds to sector 5. Secures the remaining Gems. Chosen position to take advantage of the Floodplain pre-Temple. This city does not have the urgency of the other 2 cities in this plan. (IOW, the DA can settle some other cities after City 2 and before this one.)

City Site: 2/1/2, 2/1/3?
Pre-Temple:
1 Floodplain: 2/0/1, 3/0/2, 4/0/2
1 Forested Plains (R): 1/2/1, 1/2/2 OR 2/1/2 (with deforestation), 1/2/2 or 2/1/2
2 River Hills: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
1 Non-River Hill: 1/1/0, 1/2/1, 1/3/1 OR
1 Gems Mountain (R): 0/1/3, 0/2/4, 0/3/5

Sum: 6/4/5 Size 3, 10/8/11 Size 5, 10/8/14 Size 5

Post-Temple:
1 Floodplain: 2/0/1, 3/0/2, 4/0/2
1 Forested Plains (R): 1/2/1, 1/2/2 OR 2/1/2 (with deforestation), 1/2/2 or 2/1/2
4 River Hills: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
Sum: 6/4/5 Size 3, 10/8/12 Size 5, 12/14/14, Size 6

Now this Post-Temple sum would likely change since it is likely, though not confirmed, that there is a plains tile SE of the Forested Plains. The stats of this tile would be 1/1/0, 2/1/1, 2/1/1, making this City Size 6 developed under Despotism, and Size 7 developed outside of despotism.
 

Attachments

  • Japa-Horse1c.JPG
    Japa-Horse1c.JPG
    146.7 KB · Views: 237
1-3 all look like good choices, but 3 takes the cake (TWO WHEAT ON FLOOD PLAINS!!! You cannot ignor that). 4 for is so-so. 5-7 are also so-so, but since they would hamper Babylonia, they get extra point in my books. 8 and 9 are just too far from the capital.

In my very humble opinion, Minister Noldodan, we should settle sector 3, 7-6, 1 and our pimary objective.
 
I would like to dispute Strider on how Sector 2 is better than Sector 3 would not be good for Settler Production.

This may be the case when developed.

However, I think that I have a site in Sector 3 which can create Settlers a bit better:

Attached is an image of what I think should be done in Sector 3, as well as a rough idea for Sectors 1 and 2. I think we can agree that the coastal tile SW of the Wheat Grass would be the site for Sector 2.

Using this site:
Sector 2:
City: 2/1/1?
2 Rocky Grasslands: 2/1/0, 2/2/1, 2/2/1
1 Wheat Grassland: 3/0/0, 3/2/1, 4/2/1
1 Regular Grassland: 2/0/0, 2/1/1, 2/1/1

Tile 1: Wheat Grass: 5-2=3/1/1 Growth in 7, 7 Shields
Tile 2: WG + RG: 7-4=3/2/1, Growth in 7, Shields = 14+7 =21
Tile 3: Entertainer: 7-6=1/2/1, Growth in 20, Settler/Temple in 9 OR
Tile 3 with Temple: WG + 2*RG: 9-6=3/3/1, Settler in 3
Time to settler w/o Temple: 7+7+9=23. 17 once Happiness is taken care of.

Now, again, this is using unimproved data. So in the long run, Sector 2 may be better,

But we need more settlers now.

If a city is placed where the Purple X is in the Screen, we get:

Tile 1: Wheat Flood: 6-2=4/1/3, Growth in 5, Shields = 5
Tile 2: WF + Forest: 7-4=3/3/4, Growth in 7, Shields = 21+5 = 26
Tile 3: WF + 2 Forests: 8-6=2/5/5, Growth in 10; Settler in 2 OR Shields = 50+26=76
Pre Temple: Tile 3: Entertainer. Temple in 2. (26->29->32) 2 Food in Box.
Time to Settler w/o Temple: 5+7+2=14

So, when Sector 2 would get its 3rd Pop point, Sector 3 would pop a Settler.

And this is without improvemtns. It also does not take Corruption into account, but both cities are in the First Ring, so I think we can dismiss corruption for this discussion.

Well, I have to get to work. I'll give you the Proposal for my idea for the Sector 3 site when I get back.
 

Attachments

  • Japa-Set-Fac.JPG
    Japa-Set-Fac.JPG
    152 KB · Views: 260
3, undoubtedly, because : settlers, great potential for early growth. After that, whatever, number 3 really should give us a bit of flexibilty, settling-wise.
 
Here's my view:

dotmap_trn_17.jpg

Strategic Resources are outlined in silver, Luxuries in gold. Babylon is clearly labeled to the south.

The proposed locations for near future settlement are Gems/Horses (green), North Port (blue), Wines (purple), and Flood Plain (Yellow).

The way I see it, we have no chance at those Roman wines. They're right next to either Rome or Veii. The game makes it so that, in general, each starting location has one luxury nearby. We have gems. I say we further jump on that, because not only do we secure them and the only horse anywhere nearby from the Babylonians, but we also get a good way to claim most of that area around the lake by cutting Babylon off. Its not a good place for a city, but I think its necessary for either third of forth. However, since people don't like all these Southern Hill Towns, I suggest we make Immo (the third city) either yellow or purple, and then send a settler from Furuyama down to the found the Horse/Gem city.
 
3 Flood Plain Wheat! :eek: :D

I am in full support of Sir Donald's Sector 3 proposal. If we irrigate those bad boys, we will have some serious growth on our hands.
 
Epimethus, I salute you. Green was indeed the "mandatory" city in the Alternate Proposal that I mentioned but didn't get around to actually placing.

The main problems I had with that were:
A: It kind of forces us to have Temple as its first project to protect Horses, as well as 2 Garrissons of Wariors to block the Western Coast, and B: it kind of neuters what I had in mind for a Sector 7 Location (on the River plains right by the Cattle.)

Info that I had of that location:
City Tile: 2/1/2 (Developed = 2,1,3?) Now this one is the one I am not entirely sure on, except for the food.

Pre-Temple:
2 River Hills:
Each one: Orginial: 1/1/1, Developed: 1/2/2, Post-Despotism: 1/3/2
Total: 4/3/4, 4/5/7, 4/7/7

Post-Temple:
Under Despotism:
1 Plains Wheat on River (2/1/1, 3/1/2)
2 Forests on River (1/2/1, 1/2/2)
1 Hill with either River or Horses (1/1/1, 1/2/2)
Total: 6/6/5 (Size 3 Undeveloped), 8/8/11? (Size 4 Developed, Gold is unsure)


Post-Despotism:
1 Plains Wheat on River (3/1/1, 4/1/2)
2 Lumbered Plains (1/1/1, 2/1/2; Requires chopping down trees)
4 Hills with River (1/1/1, 1/3/2)

Total: 8/5/6 Size 4 Undeveloped, 14/16/17 Developed Maximum of Size 7

This City will face a minor-level of Corruption, being probably "Ring 2.5"


To D. Zoi: The beauty of my Sector 3 Location is that all we'll need to do is connect the city to Furuyama's Gems No irrigation necessary, and Temple only if we really need it. Just have 1 guy be on a FPW and 2 more working in the Forests. Have Governor of Sector 3 Micro for Production after Pop Point 2 pops, but make sure that with each new Settler the 1st Guy returns to the Wheat.

As a bonus in my opinion, We could build another city in the red circle downstream of the site. My preference for that expansion city is where the dot is located. But I'm getting ahead of myself again. ;)

Modified Rubric for Productive Tiles:
City Tile: 2?/1/2, 2?/1/3?
Pre-Temple:
2 Floodplains Wheat: 4/0/1, 5/0/2, 6/0/2
2 Grassland Forests: 1/2/0, 1/2/1, 1/2/1
1 Regular Floodplains: 2/0/1, 3/0/2, 4/0/2
3 Deserts: 0/1/0, 0/2/1, 0/2/1. (With all the FPWs nearby, I think we can afford to mine these Deserts, but if you think otherwise, improvements make each 1/1/1.)
Pre-Temple, this City could be Size 7 Unimproved, Size 8 improved, and Size 10 outside of Despotism.

Post-Temple:
3 Floodplains Wheat: 4/0/1, 5/0/2, 6/0/2
2 Grassland Forests: 1/2/0, 1/2/1, 1/2/1
2 River Hills: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2
1 Rocky Grassland: 2/1/0, 2/2/1, 2/2/1
3 Regular Floodplains: 2/0/1, 3/0/2, 4/0/2
2 Regular Grasslands: 2/0/0, 2/1/1, 2/1/1
5 Deserts: 0/1/0, 0/2/1, 0/2/1. (With all the FPWs nearby, I think we can afford to mine these Deserts, but if you think otherwise, improvements make each 1/1/1.)
NOTE: This analysis does not include tiles within the effective radius of Fanatikku

Once we get that Third FPW and that Rocky Grass in range, this city could support 12 citizens without a single turn devoted to irrigation. Even in Despotism.

That third FPW is the chief reason why I made my preference. The fact that we can get production without having to mine ices the cake there.

Actually, Epi's Yellow city accomplishes most of what mine does, (including the 3 FPW and the Forests) plus it also adds a Cattle on grass, making it a possible manufacturing Powerhouse. It also allows for a good Sector 4 city at the Western Edge of the Lake next to the Rocky Grassland and the Hill. (And moves my "East 3" city SW 1 tile to the other side of the lake. I don't want to waste that Rocky Grassland ;) ) The chief problem I have with it is that it infringes on his choice of a Sector 1 City (Purple). However, if we shift Purple 1 or 2 tiles to the NE, we still have all the benefits, as well as a backup Horse, i.e. the one guarded by the Barbs. Picture of the location is attached.

Other problems include only 1 FPW in the initial City Radius. Then again, 1 FPW, 2 Forests, and the Happiness to keep them working were all I said I needed for the Settler Factory.

My Alternate to Sector 1, should Epi's Sector 3 carry:
City Site: 2/1/2?, 2/1/3?
Pre-Temple:
1 Plains Wines (R): 2/1/2, 2/2/2, 2/2/3 (if I remember my Wines correctly.)
3 Plains on River: 1/1/1, 2/1/2, 2/1/2
2 River Hills: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2

Post-Temple:
1 Plains Wines (R): 2/1/2, 2/2/2, 2/2/3 (if I remember my Wines correctly.)
3 Plains on River: 1/1/1, 2/1/2, 2/1/2
1 Floodplain: 2/0/1, 3/0/2, 4/0/2
4 River Hills: 1/1/1, 1/2/2, 1/3/2

Again, some of the River Tiles (even 1 in the Pre-Temple range) have not been explored yet. So I may be underestimating the settlement value of that area.

The "Alternate Site" drops the Floodplain (and most of the River Hills it could support) for a "River Hill with a Horse".


Other Notes: Epi and I agree on the location of an eventual "Sector 2" city (Cyan). I'm assuming that Strider would also agree that that would be his choice of location.

All things considered, it is still my opinion that we need to secure the Southern Horses and Gems, but I think that it should be a higher priority than many want... As for Sector 3, I'm thinking that Epi now has the better site, since it has more Forests than I do, only lacking for a Rocky Grassland, but making up for that with a Grass Cow.

And I think that 1 FPW and 2 Forests are enough for a start-up Factory... It's just that if you want to improve before you pop (i.e. Temple), I'm actually leaning Epi's way in Sector 3.
 

Attachments

  • Japa-Horse2.JPG
    Japa-Horse2.JPG
    102.2 KB · Views: 220
I like this plan. It is very capable and we will be able to have strong foundations for the future of Japanatica. I think that in this plan lies the future to a very strong and capable nation.

- Sarevok
Minister of War
 
First General Sarevok-san, given that I have basically proposed two articles on settlement, 1 in the North and 1 in the South, and that Epimethius has given his (assumed male) own composite proposal which currently differs in Sectors 1 and 5-6, I would like each "positive responder" to specify which "plan" they endorce.

Oh, and I apologise to the Domestic advisor if I've trampled over his territory on this. I just feel that, while each Sector ould hold only 1 city site, there would still be a good discussion over where exactly to put the city per Sector. The best example of that is Sector 6. The difference of 1 tile could affect our strategy for thousands of years.
 
Back
Top Bottom