anarres
anarchist revolutionary
It sucks, but I am glad they caught this bug and are fixing it rather than releasing the patch with it in.
Civ III: Conquests Patch Notice
- Thread starter Tavis
- Start date
Well, they won't be getting all the bugs out. I, for one, never expected them to. Heck, we are use to bug ridden patches and i just want one to fix the 2 biggies in the epic game for now.
I'm very surprised that the "AI accidentally causing war by bumping into submarines" bug is not considered critical enough to be addressed in the first major patch. My current game turned insane once subs were introduced. It's one big Battle Royale. Allies turn against allies every few turns. It's just one big mess. I'm thinking about deactivating all subs from the build queues until this bug is fixed.
Commander Bello
Say No 2 Net Validations
To the ones, who were not pleased by the dropped new combat system:
TheNiceOne has posted some figures in a new thread, called http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=72463 .
I just don't want all of us to repeat the well-known arguments, I just want to put your attention to the fact, that the comparison between "similar" - in regards to the respective strength - units is less frightening, as it is between extremes, meaning between the best attacker and the almost worst defender, or vice versa.
This, as far as I see it, has to less been taken into account during the course of our ... "discussion".
Maybe, this should be kept in mind, in case, Firaxis ever opens that case again.
TheNiceOne has posted some figures in a new thread, called http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=72463 .
I just don't want all of us to repeat the well-known arguments, I just want to put your attention to the fact, that the comparison between "similar" - in regards to the respective strength - units is less frightening, as it is between extremes, meaning between the best attacker and the almost worst defender, or vice versa.
This, as far as I see it, has to less been taken into account during the course of our ... "discussion".
Maybe, this should be kept in mind, in case, Firaxis ever opens that case again.
Historically, the list of changes in Civ3 patches has not been thorough, even in the readme you get from the actual patch. When people are burning the candle at both ends to make schedules, documentation is a low priority. Hopefully this will be included in the patch, even if undocumented.
If they are taking thier sweet time to fix MP stuff, I certainly hope they fix the submarine bug.
neorowen
The Newest of the Rowens
I am hoping someone fixes this weird problem I and others are having with the MP screen being locked. It makes the expansion a waste of money since I can't play it.
Gogf
Indescribable
Well, the two issues that I think need to be fixed the most are the FP bug, and the submarine bug. They aren't fixing either, are they?
kring
Asst Cook & Bottle Washer
I don't know about the submarine bug, which also applies to Hidden units, but for the FP bug:
Updates BETA v1.10:
CIV III: CONQUESTS BETA v1.10
* Fixed issues with corruption
TrailblazingScot
I was kittenOFchaos
Where is this patch then? 
Jurimax
Duke of Flanders
I was wondering the same thing kOc. I'm keeping my fingers crossed, but I fear it'll be something for in between Xmas and NewYear.
Greetz Jurimax
Greetz Jurimax
TedJackson
Cunning old Celt
Perhaps the proposed Combat mod has increased the probability of delays to production schedules 
Ted
Ted
BETA 1.12 is posted at the Atari support site 
TrailblazingScot
I was kittenOFchaos
I know! Just spotted it...my whining paid off - again 
We got a thread now on civfanatics (boy things can move quickly):
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=72774
We got a thread now on civfanatics (boy things can move quickly):
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=72774
warpstorm
Yumbo? Yumbo!
And the peasants rejoiced...
Similar threads
