CIV4 PBEM Enhanced

[Great_Scott]

Pah, most of those posts are me and three other people. It hasn't "taken off" as much as it looks like it has. Lol.

Still, I could chuck it in soon and join this instead Maybe.

Oh you mean I still haven't tempted you yet? Well, the thing is, by the time we get 50+ people in on this, you'll be up to Anarchy Game 200... c'mon! Sign up!! Get in quick before the rush.. you'll look cool and trend-setting

 

[Argh]

You tempted me with your first post. But I AM trying to give up internet addictions, not find new ones....

If I play, serve a term in an office to the end of that term, can I then quite the game with no stigma?

 

[Great_Scott]

Well... I don't see why not.. anyone is free to come and join... and also free to leave.

I plan on starting the game with more players than there will be Top 10 spots for each civ.. so we have a few back-benchers putting the pressure on the Top 10'ers.... plus Elections will be alot of fun that way...

Plus the backbenchers could always be double agents!

So what makes you think you'll even get serve a term??? hehe

 

[Herandar IV]

Maybe this should be in the Demogame forum?

Argh's Anarchy game is funny, especially the "players" that sabotage the Civ.

 

[Argh]

Hey, the fact you BEGGED me to join Scott, I think that means I get to be Queen, erm, I mean KING of England for as long as I want. Joke. But please, don't randomly make me be French, eh?

Argh's Anarchy is over. Niffweed17 got his way, and we died very quickly in the end.

Good luck recruiting players Scott, I'll mention it around from now on.

 

[Herandar IV]

I don't see Argh on the lucky people list.

 

[Great_Scott]

Maybe this should be in the Demogame forum?

Argh's Anarchy game is funny, especially the "players" that sabotage the Civ.

It's not a Demogame.. I dunno, should it be in their forum.. we might be stepping on thier toes? I think if it gets moved there, only people who play Demogame will see it, and possibly join.

I have a few advertising posts in the Demogame forums anyway.

 

[Great_Scott]

I don't see Argh on the lucky people list.

I don't see him on their either. He said his Anarchy game has ended (I want to be a part of the 2nd one, btw).. he said good luck, and that he'll spread the word...

But..

He didn't say he wanted to be on the lucky person list...

Maybe he should.. dammit.

P.S. Updated Improvements & Units tables to all be a conformed 17 votes.. since before there was a range of 13-16, and the ones with 13 would have more change of being built... less needed for a majority.

Wonders, I'll start after lunch, plus I'll tally all the leaders/advisors voting power to see how lucrative (or not) each one is.

 

[Locky III]

I'm up for the challenge.

 

[Great_Scott]

I'm up for the challenge.

Excellent, you're now on the lucky person list.

Note - I also added Argh. I'm taking his last post as a "yes".

 

[decarth]

Hmm, ::does the mr. burns fingers tapping:: interesting. Might have found a use for reading the art of war in this one, count me in

 

[Argh]

I sort of made a conditional offer that I'l play if I'm not randomly representing France.

Vote Argh for English military advisor!?

I'm in, if you'll have me Great Scott.

 

[Great_Scott]

I sort of made a conditional offer that I'l play if I'm not randomly representing France.

Vote Argh for English military advisor!?

I'm in, if you'll have me Great Scott.

Well i've been thinking... a good way to get people in real quick (I added 5 people to the list today, so I guess things are looking better) is to have a first come, first served basis when it comes to choosing your civ. So you may get that wish.

Thinking... although i DO like the idea of people choosing the Civ, and only the Civ with the most votes (and those who voted) goes in, 1 round at a time.

 

[potatokiosk]

I'll join. Looks like an excellent way to spend too much time on the internet.

 

[Corossol]

I'll join too. But I really think we should start in the Classical age, it has the Ancient "feeling" while giving us a few more decisions at the start (instead of waiting for a first worker/warrior for a million turns). Maybe Quick speed also (to compensate for slower decision-making). What do you think?

 

[potatokiosk]

That actually sounds like a good idea.

 

[Great_Scott]

Well, as far as I can see.. here are the pros & cons

Ancient Age

+ A slow start will allow us to warm up to this new type of game.

Classical Age

+ Like Corossol said, a Classical start will make the game more exciting with alot of decisions to make.

Currently, we have 9 members... I think it's time for a poll.... our first vote!

 

[potatokiosk]

Considering that a boring start is much more likely to make people lose interest than a exciting start...
And I think we should have just five civs... that way we'll be able to fill at this rate.

 

[Great_Scott]

Considering that a boring start is much more likely to make people lose interest than a exciting start...
And I think we should have just five civs... that way we'll be able to fill at this rate.

Well the vote will show what people want... which I've a feeling will be Classical.

Edit: Oh and as for the amount of civs... I'm leaving that open until the amount of players joining begins to slow down.

 

[potatokiosk]

I guess getting to play will be my my birthday present... (February)