Try setting it at 1.
I have to agree. Im very dissapointed about the hardware requirements. This is a turn based strategy game so i dont understand why it needs to have such high requirements.Maybe most Civ players don't play graphics-heavy games, but compared to what other games can do today, Civ 5's graphics are a joke when you factor in the specifications they need. A game with such graphics should be playing top speed and full settings in 5-7 years old hardware.
I have a Tandy 1000 and 2400 baud modem.
All I need to know is can I run this puppy?
I have to agree. Im very dissapointed about the hardware requirements. This is a turn based strategy game so i dont understand why it needs to have such high requirements.
I myself have a:
intel e8400 CPU
8800GT graphic card.
Once i get well into a standard sized game im forced to play in strategic view, and time between turns takes a long time.
I have a Tandy 1000 and 2400 baud modem.
All I need to know is can I run this puppy?
I have a high end Dell Precision laptop to run sheetmetal simulations. It has an i7 with 8gb of RAM with all the bells. This games still runs like a frozen turdsicle. Boringgggg.
I was one of the people who said it's difficult to make do parallel programming (in context to this game anyway). Because it's a turn based game with lots of rules that need to be followed by each civ on each turn in exactly the same order, it seems it would be harder to send off various tasks that may finish at undetermined times.