I also think K.1 is begging for trouble. It would be far better to just assume everything in the TCIT is legal, and if someone goofed then they're responsible, not the DP. Besides, the determination of who should post (as K.1 is currently written this seems to be the focus) is trivial compared to deciding which department an instruction should apply to. That should be a question for the judiciary as a JR (not a citizen complaint unless it is obvious the erroneous post was intended to overstep a departments bounds).
One thing troubles me, and that is the apparent desire to disallow instructions in the form of "do what this poll says". As one example, I'm usually very well prepared way in advance, but can't always check the poll and post its result just over 1 hour in advance of the turn chat time. I want to give the people their say, and there is rarely time to do a discussion and a poll of reasonable length which ends more than 8-12 hours before the TC so the responsible leader can check the poll and post an instruction during a time he/she is available.
One thing troubles me, and that is the apparent desire to disallow instructions in the form of "do what this poll says". As one example, I'm usually very well prepared way in advance, but can't always check the poll and post its result just over 1 hour in advance of the turn chat time. I want to give the people their say, and there is rarely time to do a discussion and a poll of reasonable length which ends more than 8-12 hours before the TC so the responsible leader can check the poll and post an instruction during a time he/she is available.