People making a statement about spamming and asking not to be banned will be banned, judging fr previous cases.....Originally posted by cgannon64
I'm spamming now to get 1000...![]()
(please don't ban me)
CG
People making a statement about spamming and asking not to be banned will be banned, judging fr previous cases.....Originally posted by cgannon64
I'm spamming now to get 1000...![]()
(please don't ban me)
CG
Originally posted by Shabbaman
I think it'd be better if it somehow reflects the quality of your posts. I don't really see how that's possible,
Originally posted by Portuguese
Sometimes I give just a. In threads that I think are very cool, have no answers or are passing to page 2 and deserve to be pulled up...
But why do it frequently? What is the point to have an high post count?
I agree with that idea of Wild West, but I fail to understand why people today do that... Especially because the most spamming time was BEFORE post-counting to be seen under one's title!
(older posters can confirm this one...)
It's so easy to pull our post count till 300. Why to spam? Just participate in many threads and give your opinion normally in all OT and General CIV3 threads, play a bit chess, open a thread about your favourite games in other Games, ask things in Site feedback, go to CIV1 forum to ask stuff, put jokes on-line,...
It's so easy that it should be natural...
Originally posted by Knight-Dragon
They started it.I was only responding to posts above mine, like always.
![]()
OK, enough. This thread has gone way way over the edge of the title....