bob rulz
Prince
I have a few questions about this strategy that I always hear regarding forests.
Why do I always hear that you should pretty much immediately cut down any forests in your city radius? This sounds like such a waste of worker time. It gives you a one-time shield bonus for something that probably isn't going to be extremely important; why not save those shields for something that really matters later in the game? With the forests you have 2 shields, and more than likely you have enough food in the city radius to sustain a city early in the game, so clearing them for the grasslands makes no sense unless it really needs it.
I'd really like to know why I always hear this strategy mentioned. Cutting down a few of them is good, but why all of them? It makes no sense to me.
Why do I always hear that you should pretty much immediately cut down any forests in your city radius? This sounds like such a waste of worker time. It gives you a one-time shield bonus for something that probably isn't going to be extremely important; why not save those shields for something that really matters later in the game? With the forests you have 2 shields, and more than likely you have enough food in the city radius to sustain a city early in the game, so clearing them for the grasslands makes no sense unless it really needs it.
I'd really like to know why I always hear this strategy mentioned. Cutting down a few of them is good, but why all of them? It makes no sense to me.