Deity Domination

The-Hawk

Old Original Geezer
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
2,268
Location
West Chester, PA
I finally got a domination win on deity on a standard map (4 random AI's, normal barbs).

deity hof cropped 2.JPG

For two major reasons, I found it to be very difficult to win by domination on deity with this map size:

1) On a larger map, you need more cities to get domination. It is hard to balance between the need to build economy to support those cities vs. the need to rush your opponents before they get too advanced. (PS... I decided to play this without using the "perpetual anarchy exploit", so economy was a major challenge).

2) Because of the distances, it is hard to get to all the AI's before they get too far ahead on techs.

I went to war as soon as I could get a few Praets up, and was in constant war for many years. At first, my workers concentrated on chopping Praets only, I hardly did any tile improvements.

I razed many of the cities I captured, but not all. I figured that if I left too many gaps, the AI's would just fill them back up. As a result, my economy was running at a deficit almost from the beginning. I pretty much stopped research after Iron Working, just couldn't afford it. I was forced to stay in constant war, I needed to keep capturing new cities so I wouldn't run out of money. Luckily, I captured a city with a wonder that produced two Great Merchants... their windfalls kept me solvent. :)

Even with my focus on early warmongering, I was only able to stunt 3 of the AI's. The Incas were a little too far away, and were too strong when I got to them. So, I needed to make nice with them, and hope they stayed below 32% of the total land (so I could get 68% without trying to fight them). I researched pottery and went cottage and settler crazy.

In the end, I was JUST able to squeak over 68% by producing some Great Artists and dropping some culture bombs to grab a few tiles from the Incas. Around 200 AD, I thought I had the game under control, but it took me a loonnnnggg time to research up to Drama so I could adjust culture to fill gaps, and a long time to build some GAs for culture bombs. It would have been even longer, but my best bud Huayna gave me a couple of techs along the way. Anyhow, my final date was 1050 AD, seemed pretty damned slow. :(

Given how hard this was on a standard map, I can't imagine winning on large or huge maps (conquest - yes, domination - no).

So, some questions for the board:

- I noticed only there is only one game on the HOF for deity domination -standard map, and I'm pretty sure Moonsinger used perpetual anarchy. There are no HOF dominations on large or huge. Obviously, many people do not post on the HOF... so, how many of you have been able to get deity domination wins on larger maps (with or without perpetual anarchy)? Is it even do-able?

- In a few failed attempts, I had tried to research some of the basic worker techs and build up my economy first. But it never seemed to work, if you wait to :hammer: , you simply fall further behind on techs. Has anyone succeeded with any strategy besides bash early and often?

- I'm wondering if a "total raze" strategy would work... ie. don't keep any captured cities so your economy stays stronger, then build lots of settlers late in the game. The risk being one of the other AI's simply takes the open land. Any opinions on how well that might work?
 
I am just wondering, would a standard map with default numbers of AIs be easier or harder to beat?
 
Yeah, congrats, Hawk! Well done. I can't offer any insights, as I'm nowhere near Deity attempts yet, but congrats on your victory!

(Could it perhaps be possible to use a civ that starts with mining, and research BW for axes, then move on to worker techs? Like I said, I've never attempted Deity, but I wonder if you could get away with a poor-man's army of axes doing some early warring while you shifted focus to pottery and cottages to keep up your economy ...)
 
The-Hawk said:
There are no HOF dominations on large or huge. Obviously, many people do not post on the HOF... so, how many of you have been able to get deity domination wins on larger maps (with or without perpetual anarchy)? Is it even do-able?

Yes, it's do able without perpetual anarchy exploit. Basically, you need to beat the AIs through conquest, but leave the AI with one last city, then you would have all the time in the world to build toward domination, spaceship, culture, or whatever victory. The reason there aren't many games posted on the HOF at the moment is probably because many people are waiting for the patch.;)
 
mutax2003 said:
I am just wondering, would a standard map with default numbers of AIs be easier or harder to beat?

Much harder to beat!
 
The-Hawk said:
I finally got a domination win on deity on a standard map (4 random AI's, normal barbs).

Well done. :goodjob:

The-Hawk said:
so, how many of you have been able to get deity domination wins on larger maps (with or without perpetual anarchy)? Is it even do-able?

Yes, domination can be done, look at my entry and you'll see. ;) http://hof.civfanatics.net/civ4/game_info.php?entryID=1517

I did not go for domination because that would be too boring. :sleep: Anyway, I reloaded my save (20 AD) and managed Domination. :)
 
The-Hawk said:
I finally got a domination win on deity on a standard map (4 random AI's, normal barbs).

Great game. :goodjob: You submitted it?

Shadowsong said:
Yes, domination can be done, look at my entry and you'll see. ;) http://hof.civfanatics.net/civ4/game_info.php?entryID=1517

I did not go for domination because that would be too boring. :sleep: Anyway, I reloaded my save (20 AD) and managed Domination. :)

How do you even win conquest? :eek: Large maps are possible?
 
Kalleyao said:
Great game. :goodjob: You submitted it?


Thanks... yes I did submit. Not the fastest by far, but I thought it would be very cool to see my name listed below Moonsinger on the chart! :)
 
Shadowsong said:
Well done. :goodjob:



Yes, domination can be done, look at my entry and you'll see. ;) http://hof.civfanatics.net/civ4/game_info.php?entryID=1517

I did not go for domination because that would be too boring. :sleep: Anyway, I reloaded my save (20 AD) and managed Domination. :)


Actually, I took a good look at your game (and several others on the HOF) a couple of weeks ago... I wanted to see how people were winning at Deity before I took it on. Great learning experience!

Based on your comments and Moonsingers, I'm thinking the key to domination is to conquer to the point of extinction, then build your cities. Just better make sure you get all of the AI's beaten into submission quickly, still must be hard on large/huge maps.

And, with the new patch it will be incrementally harder. All the more fun! ;)
 
Shadowsong said:
I did not go for domination because that would be too boring. :sleep: Anyway, I reloaded my save (20 AD) and managed Domination. :)

Yes, I see what you meant. It would be too boring because you have already won the game. However, if you see yourself playing a brand new game from that point forward, you may find a different type of fun. Basically, it's like starting a brand new but different type of game. May be the following will explain my weird gaming style:

Game #1: Play Civilization (usually until I win the game)
Game #2: Play SimCity (basically, now I'm playing SimCity using Civ4)
Game #3: Make my own Sim or Set my own victory condition. For example, 5 milions gold victory (the game is won when I have 5 millions gold in my treasury).
 
The-Hawk said:
- I'm wondering if a "total raze" strategy would work... ie. don't keep any captured cities so your economy stays stronger, then build lots of settlers late in the game. The risk being one of the other AI's simply takes the open land. Any opinions on how well that might work?

yes it is working.i won 2 games with standart map.one of the game i used America and it is not as good as Rome but it is working.i always attack the strongest guy and i never finish them totally.if you do that you have to face more more more... longbowman and macemans of the other guys.:).just get them weak and attack again.and for America i think it is very easy to balance the economy and the tech.

and if you get a golden age with America it is damn too good.:D :crazyeye: .


congrats to your domination victory.:goodjob: :goodjob:
 
The-Hawk said:
I'm thinking the key to domination is to conquer to the point of extinction, then build your cities.

That's a good plan. Even if you fail to conquer to the point of extinction, you would still be in good position to explore other alternative solution such as Permanent Alliances. Good luck!:)

PS: I haven't yet won a game on a huge deity map. However, I know it's possible because I have been getting very close. May be Shadowsong or A_Turkish_Guy will get to it first. Hopefully, I will learn some new tricks from their games. Good luck to both Shadowsong and A_Turkish_Guy too!
 
The-Hawk said:
Actually, I took a good look at your game (and several others on the HOF) a couple of weeks ago... I wanted to see how people were winning at Deity before I took it on. Great learning experience!

It's good to see that my save helped someone :) , I thought everybody hated the anarchy exploit. :rolleyes:

Moonsinger said:
Yes, I see what you meant. It would be too boring because you have already won the game. However, if you see yourself playing a brand new game from that point forward, you may find a different type of fun. Basically, it's like starting a brand new but different type of game. May be the following will explain my weird gaming style:

Game #1: Play Civilization (usually until I win the game)
Game #2: Play SimCity (basically, now I'm playing SimCity using Civ4)
Game #3: Make my own Sim or Set my own victory condition. For example, 5 milions gold victory (the game is won when I have 5 millions gold in my treasury).

Good advice, but I usually have my goal set up before the game starts. Therefore, it's hard for me to switch my strategy in the middle of a game.

Moonsinger said:
PS: I haven't yet won a game on a huge deity map. However, I know it's possible because I have been getting very close. May be Shadowsong or A_Turkish_Guy will get to it first. Hopefully, I will learn some new tricks from their games. Good luck to both Shadowsong and A_Turkish_Guy too!

A_Turkish_Guy, are you also playing Huge Deity? That's great, I wish both you and Moonsinger good luck.
 
Moonsinger said:
May be Shadowsong or A_Turkish_Guy will get to it first. Hopefully, I will learn some new tricks from their games. Good luck to both Shadowsong and A_Turkish_Guy too!

ehehe.it is not possible to get it first.i quit Civ4 until i am done with Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion.it will take a month to finish it complately.:crazyeye: :D .so good luck to all about the huge deity.:suicide: :suicide:


Shadowsong said:
A_Turkish_Guy, are you also playing Huge Deity?

yes i am.But not for the next month.
 
Moonsinger i think you are playing Simcity4 .
i played that too. and my best is 284 mil gold.(it is not gold .it is graf or something else.:))
 
Still_Asleep said:
what is perpetual anarchy?

Perpetual anarchy is a strategy Moonsinger developed a couple of months ago. The idea is to constantly change your civics. During the periods of anarchy, your economy is shut down. This means you can take over a large number of cities without the maintenance costs killing you. When you come out of anarchy, you simply change your civics and go back into it. If you want to read about it, Moonsinger has a great thread in the strategy articles forum about early warmongering on Deity that explains it. Even if you don't use the anarchy strategy, there is a lot to learn from her approach.

There has been some debate over whether is was an exploit or not. I decided not to use it, but I do think it was very clever. In any event, I understand the new patch has closed this loophole (haven't tried it myself).
 
Doesnt sound like a real exploit when you pay nothing while you get nothing - no production no science no growth no nothing and then again you will have to go out of anarchy at some point of time where you WILL pay and/or lose your army.
 
Shadowsong said:
I thought everybody hated the anarchy exploit. :rolleyes:
Personally I don't bother people using it.
 
Back
Top Bottom