Hi all
Just curious about wether people feel democracy is signifigantly better for peaceful gains even when the map is very crowded and empires relatively small.
I decided to have a crowded map to add a different challenge (every civ enabled, marlas european map) and its going ok. I got the great library...so im actually 2 or 3 techs up. Ive got about 18 cities..and nearest rival has about 10... i thought that might be enough city advantage for a peaceful win as map now fully settled..
But its come to the point now where i have to decide wether to go education/banking/democracy and kill my great library or wait for someone else to discover it and stay republic.
Now this has made me look at wether democracy is actually that superior ...and maybee im missing something but..
150% worker efficiency....ok but most my land is roaded/mined/irrigated fully now anyway
Less corruption... i do have some corruption 50% on furthest flung city... but i will still have corruption even under democracy...
More problems with war weariness!...the AI seems intent on fighting me and under republic it isnt causing much problem.
So...question is ... are there reasons im missing here for a rush to democracy? On civ 2 it was miles better if i recal and i would beeline to it if going peacefull...but it seems less clear cut here.
Also one q, for some reason i seem to be getting unit support....under a republic!!!
is this some effect of using marlas european map?
Thanks
Just curious about wether people feel democracy is signifigantly better for peaceful gains even when the map is very crowded and empires relatively small.
I decided to have a crowded map to add a different challenge (every civ enabled, marlas european map) and its going ok. I got the great library...so im actually 2 or 3 techs up. Ive got about 18 cities..and nearest rival has about 10... i thought that might be enough city advantage for a peaceful win as map now fully settled..
But its come to the point now where i have to decide wether to go education/banking/democracy and kill my great library or wait for someone else to discover it and stay republic.
Now this has made me look at wether democracy is actually that superior ...and maybee im missing something but..
150% worker efficiency....ok but most my land is roaded/mined/irrigated fully now anyway
Less corruption... i do have some corruption 50% on furthest flung city... but i will still have corruption even under democracy...
More problems with war weariness!...the AI seems intent on fighting me and under republic it isnt causing much problem.
So...question is ... are there reasons im missing here for a rush to democracy? On civ 2 it was miles better if i recal and i would beeline to it if going peacefull...but it seems less clear cut here.
Also one q, for some reason i seem to be getting unit support....under a republic!!!
is this some effect of using marlas european map?
Thanks