cgannon64
BOB DYLAN'S ROCKIN OUT!
That "C" on "Prop C" looks like it was drawn on with the Pencil in Paint.
Did we really go to the Moon?
- Thread starter Capulet
- Start date
Pontiuth Pilate
Republican Jesus!
Yeah, I saw Bad Astronomy's site before. Great work. Wasn't there also a site in which someone used little astronaut figurines to explain the shadow "paradoxes"? [shadows of different lengths, angles, etc] That one was also very good.
Pontiuth Pilate
Republican Jesus!
Achinz
Hermit of Huangshan
There was a very clever TV spoof based on this claim by a French director. He got the cooperation of the likes of Haigh, Rumsfeld to memorise his scripted spin in realistic "interviews".
It was only at the end that the bloopers of fluffed lines were played and comments by the coopted conspirators like "Gee, you want me to say that?" were shown.
It was only at the end that the bloopers of fluffed lines were played and comments by the coopted conspirators like "Gee, you want me to say that?" were shown.
I great documentary.
Achinz
Hermit of Huangshan
@vonork
I did not note the name but a Google gave this with the title of the film:
"In 2002, a French documentary maker released a spoof documentary film, 'Dark Side of the Moon', which purported to tell the story of how Kubrick was recruited to fake the Moon landings, and featured interviews with, among others, Kubrick's widow and a swag of American statesmen including Henry Kissinger and Donald Rumsfeld. It was an elaborate joke: interviews and other footage were presented out of context and in some cases completely staged, with actors playing interviewees who had never existed (and in many cases named after characters from Kubrick's films, just one of many clues included to reveal the joke to the alert viewer). [1]
I did not note the name but a Google gave this with the title of the film:
"In 2002, a French documentary maker released a spoof documentary film, 'Dark Side of the Moon', which purported to tell the story of how Kubrick was recruited to fake the Moon landings, and featured interviews with, among others, Kubrick's widow and a swag of American statesmen including Henry Kissinger and Donald Rumsfeld. It was an elaborate joke: interviews and other footage were presented out of context and in some cases completely staged, with actors playing interviewees who had never existed (and in many cases named after characters from Kubrick's films, just one of many clues included to reveal the joke to the alert viewer). [1]
The astronauts original Moon landing was not faked, Oswald did not kill Kennedy, and OJ Simpson was guilty.
When people involved with the initial story tell a new story that coincides with the conspiracy theorists beliefs years later, then the latter is likely true. Otherwise, either hundreds of people who know one of the biggest (and likely greatest) secrets of their age are able to all keep their mouths shut and disspell all detailed acquisitions for the remainder of their lives - even if some of these questions deal with things outside the original agreed-upon 'story' - or - it happened as reported.
That said, something crashed at Roswell in '47 & there were bodies. Now it could have been a top secret US aircraft (2 decades before they landed on the moon, and only a couple years after raiding top secret Nazi designs in WWII) - or - (and according to many, many witnesses 'officially' & 'unofficially' involved in the cover...err...clean-up), it was an extra-terrestrial craft & those bodies were aliens.
I would throw 'Roswell' in with 'JFK' when calling 'conspiracy' - but it could have just been top secret test flights...who knows.
Are our lives so boring we challenge all that's said to be true - or are we just looking for the truth and challenging the unreasonable?
When people involved with the initial story tell a new story that coincides with the conspiracy theorists beliefs years later, then the latter is likely true. Otherwise, either hundreds of people who know one of the biggest (and likely greatest) secrets of their age are able to all keep their mouths shut and disspell all detailed acquisitions for the remainder of their lives - even if some of these questions deal with things outside the original agreed-upon 'story' - or - it happened as reported.
That said, something crashed at Roswell in '47 & there were bodies. Now it could have been a top secret US aircraft (2 decades before they landed on the moon, and only a couple years after raiding top secret Nazi designs in WWII) - or - (and according to many, many witnesses 'officially' & 'unofficially' involved in the cover...err...clean-up), it was an extra-terrestrial craft & those bodies were aliens.
I would throw 'Roswell' in with 'JFK' when calling 'conspiracy' - but it could have just been top secret test flights...who knows.
Are our lives so boring we challenge all that's said to be true - or are we just looking for the truth and challenging the unreasonable?
