GIDS888 said:
Got attacked by the AI with Carriers all the time in Civ3, haven't seen it yet in Civ4 although PC limitations mean I tend to go for UN/Cultural/Spacerace victories - on Noble/Standard/Epic it goes waa-ay slo-ow after 1850 if there's a lot of warfare, which obviously hacks me off a tad.
I like no bombers from carriers - ever see a B-17 land or take off from one?
Well, well, one would be surprised. Even disregarding the use of US Army B-25 medium bombers off the USS Hornet to strike Japan in April 1942, there is a more impressive example. Lt. James H. Flatley of the US Navy received the Distinguished Flying Cross for successfully operating a C-130 Hercules (a 4 engine turboprop aircraft with a wingspan of 132 ft.) off the flight deck of the USS Forrestal in Oct. of 1963. Flatley made 29 "touch and go" landing/takeoffs, 21 full-stop landings, and 21 unassisted takeoffs from the carrier's flight deck. Astoundingly, the plane needed only 460 ft. to stop (no arresting hook was used) and 745 ft. for the take-off, even with a full aircraft loadout of 121,000 lbs. gross wt. Nor was this done on a flat calm day; it was accomplished in moderately rough seas 500 miles east of Boston in October in the North Atlantic.
You can see photos and more details at this location:
http://www.scenery.org/c-130.htm
Amazing.
Regarding bombers and fighters on CV's, this is a design choice, presumably for play balance, that I disagree with. Histrorically, although doubtlessly land based aircraft are more capable, the wt. difference carried by sea based "bombers" and land based ones is not enough to justfy segregration. A USN SBD divebomber carried a 1000 lb. bomb, more than a stuka could carry. An A-6 carries more bomb wt. than a WW2 B-17. The Civ series seems a bit prejudiced against Navy's and their strengths in general; historically dominance of the sea has been very frequently linked to major world power status from Spain in the age of discovery to England's Bratainnia to the US's domination after WW2 and its victory in the cold war, just as failure to compete at sea successfully was a hallmark of the would-be power (e.g. France, Japan and the USSR). It will be very interesting to see if in the future India and China continue this trend or if the long history of the importance of seapower in world power status, changes.
I would like to see bombers on CV's, although I would prefer time spent on that to go to increasing the importance and presence of the entire Naval side of the game.
Civ on, all. I need to return to my pending invasion of Montezuma ...