EvilConqueror
Warlord
RoP is fine, but our map is likely to be much more valuable than theirs.
Aye. I would just go with the RoP.
RoP is fine, but our map is likely to be much more valuable than theirs.
RoP is fine, but our map is likely to be much more valuable than theirs.
We would like to agree on a Right of Passage with you (first of all until the end of the AA).
Exchanging maps is a different deal, we believe.
We donnot think that trading maps is a different deal. Right at the moment the main reason for RoP ist making maps. We did not intent to sent any units into your territory and since entering the anarchy will happen soon we will probably not even have a single chance to move just one unit into your territory in order to chart the shape of this continent. Thus we must decline a simply RoP at the moment.
Maybe we will have the opportunity to move a warrior into your territory, but this would interfere with your workers and will cost quite some time. Simply trading maps does prevent such inconvenient measures.
How about we trade maps once we complete Map Making only (instead of every turn for the rest of the Ancient Age)?
Alright.
We are exploring your territory (without asking). Thus you have a right to get knowledge of ours.
We'd agree to a one-time exchange, as soon as we get Map Making. (turn after the current one).
This would solve the trouble you mentioned in your latest post.
Is that acceptable for you?
That sounds acceptable to me. If they won't give us that, propose that we end the alliance and go to war, that way we will only have to deal with two opponents, rather than three.
What????What?![]()
We are not exactly happy about just an one-time exchange, but we do also not want to misuse this situation. We agree to your proposal. But if you change your mind in favour of recurring exchanges we would like to proceed that way.