mrspank
Chieftain
microbe said:But it is still a MAJOR bug and this feature is BROKEN.
I believe this bug was fixed in the 1.09 patch.
microbe said:But it is still a MAJOR bug and this feature is BROKEN.
gunnergoz said:It's only broken if you insist upon using it. Yes, it needs to be corrected, but it's not a game-stopper (my definition) unless it makes the game unplayable. IMHO.
tegilbor said:It is definitely a major bug and it most definitely makes the game unplayable for multiplayer games with AI involvement.
The "Just don't do it" solution doesn't quite work in multiplayer.
DaviddesJ said:Of course the game is not "unplayable" just because people can cheat. Just agreeing not to do it works fine.
I play board games with my friends all the time; we don't immediately throw the game in the trash just because it's possible for whoever is sitting nearest the bank to covertly take some of the cash.
I wouldn't play Civ4 PBEM with people I don't trust, but that's true regardless of whether any particular bug gets fixed. There will always be ways to cheat, at least in PBEM.
mrspank said:The point is that because that exploit existed, you could never be sure that your opponents were playing fairly.
DaviddesJ said:If that exploit didn't exist, there are still a thousand other ways they could be cheating. What difference does it make whether the number is 1000 or 1001? You still have to trust them, either way.
mrspank said:In any case, I realize that you need to trust your opponents. But if Internet multiplayer gaming has taught me anything, it's that people will cheat if given the opportunity to do so.
mrspank said:I'm sorry, but could you name some of the 1,000 other ways?
mrspank said:You must have not played a lot of multiplayer Internet gaming before.
anti_strunt said:Amen to that, sadly enough... Anyway, the bug is fixed with 1.09, right?