Great structures throughout history

Hmm some great feats of architecture in my opinion in no particular order

England - Big Ben

Australia -Sydney Opera House

India - The Taj

China - Great Wall

Egypt - The pyramids

Greece - Parthanon

Romans - The Pantheon and the Forum

Persians - Persepolis
 
Great thread.

Here is my list:

Egypt - Pyramids
Greece - Colossus
USA - Mount Rushmore
Russia - Kremlin, Orbital station Mir (while it was operational)
UK - Big Ben
France - Eiffel tower
Italy - Tower in Pizza
Israel - Temple of Solomon (only western wall remains unfortunately)
Serbia - Temple of Saint Sava
Turkey - Hagia Sofia
China - Great wall
Montenegro - Njegos Mausoleum
.
.
.
 
Great thread.

Here is my list:

Egypt - Pyramids
Greece - Colossus
USA - Mount Rushmore
Russia - Kremlin, Orbital station Mir (while it was operational)
UK - Big Ben
France - Eiffel tower
Italy - Tower in Pizza
Israel - Temple of Solomon (only western wall remains unfortunately)
Serbia - Temple of Saint Sava
Turkey - Hagia Sofia
China - Great wall
Montenegro - Njegos Mausoleum
.
.
.

Tower... in... Pizza?? :eek: :eek:

:D :lol: :D :rotfl:

And yes, I agree it's a great thread. Not making fun of you, but I actually laughed out really loud when I read that. :)
 
Canada:None Applicable.

Great thread.

Here is my list:

Egypt - Pyramids
Greece - Colossus
USA - Mount Rushmore
Russia - Kremlin, Orbital station Mir (while it was operational)
UK - Big Ben
France - Eiffel tower
Italy - Tower in Pizza
Israel - Temple of Solomon (only western wall remains unfortunately)
Serbia - Temple of Saint Sava
Turkey - Hagia Sofia
China - Great wall
Montenegro - Njegos Mausoleum
.
.
.

I've been reviewing everything in sight lately, so I'll just review your list.

Mout Rushmore-Iconic, but not great. Many other things like that in world. I would put statue of liberty.
Big Ben-Same as Rushmore. The whole parlement thing would work though, for me.
Tower of Pisa-A mistake. Instead, I would put St. Peters.
Temple of Solomon-I think you're mixing temples up, the western wall is from a later temple. But the temple would do okay.
 
I have to say I don't really see why the Houses of Parliament (that is, the palace of Westminster) or its clock tower (Big Ben being the bell, of course) is really such a great building. It may be iconic but really, it's just a clock. The London Eye, directly opposite, is more impressive as a structure.
 
Tower... in... Pizza?? :eek: :eek:

:D :lol: :D :rotfl:

And yes, I agree it's a great thread. Not making fun of you, but I actually laughed out really loud when I read that. :)

It's OK. I should write Pisae, but I couldn't resist. :lol:
 
Canada:None Applicable.



I've been reviewing everything in sight lately, so I'll just review your list.

Mout Rushmore-Iconic, but not great. Many other things like that in world. I would put statue of liberty.
Big Ben-Same as Rushmore. The whole parlement thing would work though, for me.
Tower of Pisa-A mistake. Instead, I would put St. Peters.
Temple of Solomon-I think you're mixing temples up, the western wall is from a later temple. But the temple would do okay.

When I think of it St. Peters is a better solution.
I know it is from the second temple destroyed by Romans, while Solomons temple was destroyed by Babylonians. I just consider it as one structure.
 
I agree with Marla that the Eiffel Tower is certainly the most symbolic building in France (and perhaps in all Europe), but as far as impressiveness go, I would rank Versailles and Notre Dame above it. And Cluny too, if those jacobin bastards had left it alone.
Have you seen the Eiffel Tower for real ? Sorry to ask that question but the thing is simply that it's very hard to get a real impression of how huge it is only in viewing pictures of it.

I live in Paris and each time I get at the basis of that structure, it still amazes me about how huge it is. Generally speaking, I would say that actually, not only it's height, but also its width, makes the building impressive. The four feet of the tower forms a square of 125m x 125m. The first floor is at 60 meters of height meaning about the height of a 20-story residential building. It gives a feeling once you're at the bottom of it of pure hugeness... and all this has been built during the 19th century.

Notre-Dame is indeed impressive but there are many other impressive cathedrals. Amiens is indeed the largest gothic cathedral in France, and I've personally enjoyed the Kölner Dom even more. Afterwards, you have off course Saint-Peters basilica even if I agree it's not really the same kind. As for Versailles, it's true that everything is out of scale : the different buildings, the furniture, the massive garden perspective reaching the horizon. But still, I would say that Eiffel Tower remains the most impressive, at least to my own eyes of local.
 
Marla_Singer said:
UK : Oxford University ?
That's not a particular building, though.
True, however the Alhambra de Granada isn't a particular building either... but more a collection of several buildings of different periods of time.

I haven't been to Oxford, but from the pictures I've seen of it, I guess it's probably the British architectural accomplishment which impresses me the most.
 
Have you seen the Eiffel Tower for real ? Sorry to ask that question but the thing is simply that it's very hard to get a real impression of how huge it is only in viewing pictures of it.

I live in Paris and each time I get at the basis of that structure, it still amazes me about how huge it is. Generally speaking, I would say that actually, not only it's height, but also its width, makes the building impressive. The four feet of the tower forms a square of 125m x 125m. The first floor is at 60 meters of height meaning about the height of a 20-story residential building. It gives a feeling once you're at the bottom of it of pure hugeness... and all this has been built during the 19th century.

Notre-Dame is indeed impressive but there are many other impressive cathedrals. Amiens is indeed the largest gothic cathedral in France, and I've personally enjoyed the Kölner Dom even more. Afterwards, you have off course Saint-Peters basilica even if I agree it's not really the same kind. As for Versailles, it's true that everything is out of scale : the different buildings, the furniture, the massive garden perspective reaching the horizon. But still, I would say that Eiffel Tower remains the most impressive, at least to my own eyes of local.

I haven't, but we've got a bigger building than those all here. :p

(yeah, I know you weren't talking to me :))
 
True, however the Alhambra de Granada isn't a particular building either... but more a collection of several buildings of different periods of time.

I haven't been to Oxford, but from the pictures I've seen of it, I guess it's probably the British architectural accomplishment which impresses me the most.

Well, there isn't a central university building or complex or anything. The university consists of various colleges, halls, libraries, departments, and other more or less distinct entities scattered all over the city. So there's no bit you can point to and say, "That's the university!" (although American tourists always think it's University College, not realising that's just its name). While many of these entities have nice buildings, I don't think any of them is in itself especially impressive. Taken together they might be, but since they're not only from different periods but not even next to each other, it would be a bit artificial to do so. You can't even call it a "collection", let alone a single group of buildings.
 
Have you seen the Eiffel Tower for real ? Sorry to ask that question but the thing is simply that it's very hard to get a real impression of how huge it is only in viewing pictures of it.
Yep, I even went up there and paid 10 euros for some icecream :p

It is huge, and truly awesome and beautiful, but I don't think it's the best France has to offer.

I live in Paris and each time I get at the basis of that structure, it still amazes me about how huge it is. Generally speaking, I would say that actually, not only it's height, but also its width, makes the building impressive. The four feet of the tower forms a square of 125m x 125m. The first floor is at 60 meters of height meaning about the height of a 20-story residential building. It gives a feeling once you're at the bottom of it of pure hugeness... and all this has been built during the 19th century.
Agreed. And it also fits perfectly with the parisian scenery in general. Very rarely do we see such a huge building fit so well in a historical city like Paris.

Notre-Dame is indeed impressive but there are many other impressive cathedrals. Amiens is indeed the largest gothic cathedral in France, and I've personally enjoyed the Kölner Dom even more. Afterwards, you have off course Saint-Peters basilica even if I agree it's not really the same kind. As for Versailles, it's true that everything is out of scale : the different buildings, the furniture, the massive garden perspective reaching the horizon. But still, I would say that Eiffel Tower remains the most impressive, at least to my own eyes of local.
All fair points, but Notre Dame was really impacting to me. I mean, it was built 900 years ago and it is absolutely beautiful not to mention huge.

St. Peters is not comparable, and it also has 400 years of advantage.

Generally speaking the Eiffel Tower did not have the same impact for me as Notre Dame or Versailles, maybe because I had already seen the one in Las Vegas :p
 
Taj Mahal is so sterotypical for India...try Hamp in South Indiai: (I took these pics BTW)

The ruined city:

Spoiler :
DSC02314.JPG


Spoiler :
DSC02315.JPG
 
I haven't, but we've got a bigger building than those all here. :p

(yeah, I know you weren't talking to me :))
Actually, we have also a building in Paris which is as big as the house of Parliament in Bucharest. 350,000 m² of floor area. It's called Coeur Défense and it's located in the business district of La Défense.

PdefCDefVi.jpg



Luiz said:
Generally speaking the Eiffel Tower did not have the same impact for me as Notre Dame or Versailles, maybe because I had already seen the one in Las Vegas. :p
The one in Vegas being twice smaller than the real one.
Well ok... if you considered you visited Paris simply in visiting a hotel in Vegas, then I understand better how you could think that way. :p
 
The one in Vegas being twice smaller than the real one.
Well ok... if you considered you visited Paris simply in visiting a hotel in Vegas, then I understand better how you could think that way. :p

You misunderstood, I visited both.
I just said that I had never seen anything similar to Notre Dame or Versailles, while I had seen something similar to the Eifell Tower, even if smaller and out of context. And I consider the first two as greatest accomplishments as well, considering the dates in which they were built.

Anyway I was only trying to be lightheartdly funny, not taking a jab at Paris in any way, I love that city.
 
Actually, we have also a building in Paris which is as big as the house of Parliament in Bucharest. 350,000 m² of floor area. It's called Coeur Défense and it's located in the business district of La Défense.

PdefCDefVi.jpg



The one in Vegas being twice smaller than the real one.
Well ok... if you considered you visited Paris simply in visiting a hotel in Vegas, then I understand better how you could think that way. :p

In no way can we compare the buildings of France with ours, seriously. :) Those in France are so beautiful, styled and arranged in a great way, as opposed to ours, which are not like this at all.

Still, this one has a larger volume and mass, and it's much more decorated (though in a megalomaniac and often useless way):

It contains 1,000,000 cubic meters of marble from Transylvania, most from Ruşchiţa; 3,500 metric tonnes of crystal - 480 chandeliers, 1,409 ceiling lights and mirrors were manufactured; 700,000 tonnes of steel and bronze for monumental doors and windows, chandeliers and capitals; 900,000 cubic meters of wood (over 95% domestic) for parquet and wainscotting, including walnut, oak, sweet cherry, elm, sycamore maple; 200,000 square meters of woolen carpets of various dimensions (machines had to be moved inside the building to weave some of the larger carpets); velvet and brocade curtains adorned with embroideries and passementeries in silver and gold.

Spoiler :
800px-Casa_poporului.jpg


Palatul_Parlamentului_Saal.jpg


Palatul_Parlamentului_Deckenleuchter.jpg


And with the new glass wing it's actually a tad bigger in floor space also, as this was measured before it was built.
 
Back
Top Bottom