Greg LeMond drops bombshell in Landis doping hearing

Drewcifer

Agent of Karma
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
3,748
Location
Minneapolis
www.startribune.com/503/story/1191488.html

Shocker testimony at Tour de France hearing
The three-time Tour de France winner disclosed he was sexually abused at age 6.

By Eddie Pells, Associated Press

Last update: May 18, 2007 – 8:25 AM

MALIBU, CALIF. - Floyd Landis' sleepy, scientific arbitration hearing morphed into a pulp-fiction blockbuster Thursday, replete with revelations of sexual abuse, allegations of threatening phone calls and even a Donald Trump-style firing.
It came courtesy of Landis' fellow American Tour de France champion Greg LeMond, who disclosed he had been sexually abused as a child and received a call Wednesday from Landis' manager who threatened to reveal the secret if LeMond showed up to testify.

LeMond, 45, now lives in Medina. He became the first American to win the Tour de France in 1986. He won the Tour twice more, in '89 and '90, after recovering from being shot and severely injured in a 1987 hunting accident.

Shortly after LeMond dropped those bombshells, the manager, Will Geoghegan, walked up to LeMond, apologized and admitted he made the call, LeMond said. Which led to "You're fired" -- the message Landis attorney Maurice Suh gave to Geoghegan while they were still standing in the hearing room.

"It was a real threat, it was real creepy, and I think it shows the extent of who it is," LeMond said before leaving the Pepperdine law school after his spellbinding day. "I think there's another side of Floyd that the public hasn't seen."

A three-man arbitration panel hearing the testimony will decide whether to uphold Landis' positive doping test after Stage 17 of last year's Tour. If it does, Landis could face a two-year ban from cycling and become the first person in the 104-year history of the Tour to have his title stripped for a doping offense.

Making it worse for last year's Tour de France champion was that the cross-examination of LeMond, designed to expose his motives and impeach his credibility, was called off because LeMond refused to answer questions about seven-time Tour winner Lance Armstrong.

"I just have to say, again, this is completely unfair," Landis attorney Howard Jacobs said.

He wanted to ask LeMond about suggestions he has made in the past that Armstrong might have doped.

But LeMond didn't think that was the main point.

"I think they didn't want me coming here today," LeMond said. "I don't know why. If you didn't do anything wrong, why would you mind me coming here today?"

Before LeMond received the threatening call from Geoghegan, his testimony was supposed to be about conversations he had with Landis shortly after news of his positive "A" urine sample had been leaked to the media.

LeMond said he urged Landis to come clean if, in fact, his backup "B" sample also came back tainted.

He said he encouraged Landis to help his sport and "more importantly, help himself."At this point, he said, 'I don't see anything that ... what good would it do? If I did, it would destroy a lot of my friends and hurt a lot of people,' " LeMond testified.

He said he used the story of his being sexually abused when he was 6 as an example of how it's good to get things out in the open.

"It nearly destroyed me by keeping the secret," LeMond said.

He said he told Landis that very few people knew that about him, then revealed that someone in the Landis camp tried to use that information to intimidate him.

LeMond described receiving a call Wednesday evening from someone who claimed to be his uncle. He said he later traced the call to Geoghegan's cell phone.

"He said, 'I'll be there tomorrow and we can talk about how we used to' perform a sexual act, LeMond said of the phone call. "I thought this was intimidation to keep me from coming here."

He said he was so distraught by the call, he filed a police report, which was presented as evidence by attorneys.

LeMond insisted he appeared to testify only to help cycling, a sport he thinks has been ruined by an unabated culture of doping.

His appearance at Pepperdine, however, made the sport look every bit the unseemly circus he's been trying to fix all these years. Still, he had no remorse.

"What I felt was right was to come here and tell the truth," he said as he walked to his car. "People say it's the message that hurts this sport, but it's not that. It's cheating that hurts this sport, and that's all I have to say."
 
Something is up here...I do not trust LeMond much on any level.

I have to say though, I would have loved to have been in the courtroom when all of this was happening.
 
Bjarne Riis has confessed he took dope the year he won: has anyone ever doubted he didn't???? He was always the most clear example of anyone you knew he has taken dope.
 
That sport is beyond hope...it's as rotten as it can get. German Telecom's members have almost all admitted that they took drugs. Riis and surely the German poster boy Ullrich have taken drugs to win. Landis has done the same and want to come up with some lame rubbish...Armstrong also did, he was able to mask it due to his sickness related sanctioned drugs...

In this sport anyone without doping has no chance of winning. I wonder how long the media and you guys continue to follow this cheating exercise. I have long stopped to follow the Tour or any other cycling sport. I loved it since I used to cycle a lot when I was younger. I was always amazed by the average speed they could handle during normal stages...I now know it was all due to performance enhancement. Surely cyclists are humans too...

anyway, forget that sport, unless they would all come clean, but they don't, it's :vomit:
 
That sport is beyond hope...it's as rotten as it can get. German Telecom's members have almost all admitted that they took drugs. Riis and surely the German poster boy Ullrich have taken drugs to win. Landis has done the same and want to come up with some lame rubbish...Armstrong also did, he was able to mask it due to his sickness related sanctioned drugs...

In this sport anyone without doping has no chance of winning. I wonder how long the media and you guys continue to follow this cheating exercise. I have long stopped to follow the Tour or any other cycling sport. I loved it since I used to cycle a lot when I was younger. I was always amazed by the average speed they could handle during normal stages...I now know it was all due to performance enhancement. Surely cyclists are humans too...

anyway, forget that sport, unless they would all come clean, but they don't, it's :vomit:


At least, some things are done against doping. Not like other sports :rolleyes:

May I remind you that Fuentes' list had 200 names of sportmen. Only the 50 names of the cyclists were realesed ...
 
No one has ever proved anything with Armstrong...and I see no reason to believe it now.
 
Not legally proven, but it's scientificly proven six of his sample in 1999 were positive.

Another reason to believe he took dope? We know all his contenders (Ullrich, Beloki, Pantani, Zulle, Basso, Mancebo, ...) took dope. Armstrong pwned them every year. If you believe he did that by eating bread and drinking water, then, you're naive ;)
 
Innocent until proven guilty in THIS country, and I think in Belgium too.

Oh, and scientifically proved by who? Just the A sample? Why is this not circulated more?
 
Innocent in the eyes of the law indeed. You can't punish him or take back any of his victories, etc.
But in my eyes, he's guilty.
Innocent until proven guilty is an important rule indeed. The reason why some cycling fans don't really respect it, is because of the fact that so many cyclists seem guilty, you really have to look for the innocent ones. And there's also the omerta ruling the sport. If anyone talks, he gets out of the cycling environnement. The best example to illustrate that is Jesus Marzano. He fainted in a TdF but said nothing until his team decided not to extend his contract. Then he started to talk about blook tranfusions. And that's how Operacion Puerto started.

The French laboratory (whose name I forgot) proved it. But the made errors in the legal procedure (leaking the information to a newspaper, didn't warn Armstrong, etc). Actually, the purpose of the research was to improve new EPO-tests, not to accuse anyone of anything. The name of the cyclists' samples should have never been revealed. That's why nothing can be done against Armstrong.
 
Isn't this the same lab with ties to the French newspaper that seems to have a vendetta against Armstrong?
 
That sport is beyond hope...it's as rotten as it can get. German Telecom's members have almost all admitted that they took drugs. Riis and surely the German poster boy Ullrich have taken drugs to win. Landis has done the same and want to come up with some lame rubbish...Armstrong also did, he was able to mask it due to his sickness related sanctioned drugs...

In this sport anyone without doping has no chance of winning. I wonder how long the media and you guys continue to follow this cheating exercise. I have long stopped to follow the Tour or any other cycling sport. I loved it since I used to cycle a lot when I was younger. I was always amazed by the average speed they could handle during normal stages...I now know it was all due to performance enhancement. Surely cyclists are humans too...

anyway, forget that sport, unless they would all come clean, but they don't, it's :vomit:

Every major sport has doping issues. The following years will prove that, I'm sure of it!

I read a series of articles with Danish doping hunter Damsgaard this week. He said two things that stuck to me.
1) Cycling is the very first sport were doping is now handled as a major problem. Many (also the UCI) are still reluctant because they fear that their sport will be destroyed. But something is been done.
2) A lot depends on the culture of the sport. Cyclism knows a doping culture from the very beginning (wine and champagne as stimulants in the beginning of the 20th century). Damsgaard also tested a lot of handbal players for years. Result: almost no doping.

So, we must applaud everybody involved for the effort in fighting the doping problem and not saying that the sport is beyond hope. If they would use the same controlling schemes in, let say, American football, the results would be shocking...
 
Back
Top Bottom