I would like at least some kind of defender in our towns. Archers are cheap to build. That is why I would build some.
I've never reolted to slavery since I seldom whip cities to finish a build. Is there another reason to revolt? Not being critical here, just trying to understand if there is a benefit I'm missing. Good call to attack a city defended by a warrior.We revolt to slavery.
Going Forward
Sir Bugsy said:Did I mess up posting the game? Please let me know.Well of course you're going to let me know.
![]()
Maybe as handy suggested, thisa can be taken at monarch difficulty. or, to have a nicer challenge, use a different Civ which makes it a tougher game. but an archer rush with GOS should also be possible.Summary:
Immortals seem broken with AW. I expect Handy to wipe Delhi off the map.
This goes so against my minimal map exploring from my Civ3 AW days.
Not flooded, but the barbs will have the best units (swords and axe-men) so we need to watch for that. I've yet to see a barb spear. I wonder if they make them.I see the first barbarian warrior. Will this map get flooded with barbarian cities?
Good idea. The Aztecs don't need any resource to build their UU.think we should try and get rid of Aztecs first
they are the biggest threat.