Harappan full civilization

It's a fairly popular idea that the Harappans were Dravidian-speakers, so you could take a modern Tamil as model for looks with some justification.

(Yes, I know there is no necessary connection 'tween race and language. We're dealing in more or less qualified guesses here, and this one is about as good as any.)
 
but I belive it is safe to say that ancient Indians probably have some connection to Modern day
there are so many different types of Indians in India, I belive some have a connection to Harappens

Also language is a possible link to race, Mongolian, Korean and Japanese are all related languages. And also we are all racially linked as well. However China is close to all those countries. And yet we are not related to "ethnic" Chinese (Han)
 
It means a specific sort of relationship. You're probably better off looking it up in a book on statistics, but briefly, that property A and B are (positively) correlated means that an object that has A is more likely to have B than one that does not have A, and vice versa.
 
After look for some minutes the statues, I think the Harappans look like Indians with some Asiatic elements, mainly in the eyes. I think I'll go to back to the first skin color and I'll try do to some changes in the face, I don't know what exactly yet. I expect this weekend show the news, the other eras and the worker/settler UU :)
 
Pakistanis are Indians for all I care. :p What next, someone is gonna claim Xhosa and Afrikaners aren't the same? ;)

The Indus valley has received alot of immigrants from Iran and Central Asia over the last couple millennia, so I doubt they're a much better model.
 
they arent really the "same"
Although neither has a single race
the back down that makes up these 2 countries is so:
Pakistan: Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashtun (Pathan), Baloch, Muhajir
India: Indo-Aryan 72%, Dravidian 25%, Mongoloid and other 3%
this is from the CIA website...
which is pretty relaiable although I didnt like that the consider Ryukyu, Yamato, and Ainu to be all just Japanese... -_-

the reason I said this is because Pakistan doesnt seems to have a major Aryan population, and because many sites claim (not proven) that the Harappans are Pakistani not Indian
 
well they are the one of the first "Japanese"...
they are such a mystery every time I read about them I get more confused sometimes I read they are cacasian sometimes seberian, sometimes they are the Jomon people, sometimes they are seprate ToT I dont know~~~

sorry for wrtitting so much on your board... it is summer vacation and I cant work on my civ stuff here, so I become boring ToT//
sorry
 
ShiroKobbure said:
they arent really the "same"
Although neither has a single race
the back down that makes up these 2 countries is so:
Pakistan: Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashtun (Pathan), Baloch, Muhajir
India: Indo-Aryan 72%, Dravidian 25%, Mongoloid and other 3%
this is from the CIA website...
which is pretty relaiable although I didnt like that the consider Ryukyu, Yamato, and Ainu to be all just Japanese... -_-

the reason I said this is because Pakistan doesnt seems to have a major Aryan population, and because many sites claim (not proven) that the Harappans are Pakistani not Indian
Click to expand...
Most Pakistani's speak Aryan languages, like Urdu, Panjabi, Pashtun, Baluchi, and Sindhi.
 
New artworks in post number 01. I can't change his face in this stage anymore (the last changes r still present in this new preview) and I'll post the other eras soon. Also the UU :)

EDITED: The two missing eras r on post number 01 and I expect post in some hours the UU, the Harappan settler ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

CivArmy s. 1994
Full Harappan civilization
Replies
2
Views
11K
Aion
A
Back
Top Bottom