I have 5 (I don't have 3)and am wondering what it is about the two games that makes many people say that 3 is so much better.
The one thing that I don't like about 5 is that you don't really know what you should do, but if you don't do things the way they should be done there is little chance of winning.
In one mission you have to find the portal to the underworld and then defeat the enemy before another army defeats them.
You basically have to guess which way to go and then just restart if you went the wrong way.
To me, that's not a challenge, it's just bumbling about until you stumble onto the right path.
The maps are beautiful and the warfare seems OK, though I don't know how the warfare in 3 compares.
The one thing that I don't like about 5 is that you don't really know what you should do, but if you don't do things the way they should be done there is little chance of winning.
In one mission you have to find the portal to the underworld and then defeat the enemy before another army defeats them.
You basically have to guess which way to go and then just restart if you went the wrong way.
To me, that's not a challenge, it's just bumbling about until you stumble onto the right path.
The maps are beautiful and the warfare seems OK, though I don't know how the warfare in 3 compares.