Hoon avoids 'napalm in Iraq' quiz

[cgannon64]

your Defence Secretary's name is Hoon?

Sounds like it should be in Dr. Strangelove, doesn't it?

 

[BasketCase]

Did you know that if you mix equal parts of gasoline
and frozen orange juice concentrate you can make napalm?

Clearly it was Al-Qaeda terrorists attacking civilians with frozen orange juice concentrate.....

(On a more serious note, how do they know who fired off the napalm?)

 

[Zeekater]

Clearly it was Al-Qaeda terrorists attacking civilians with frozen orange juice concentrate.....

(On a more serious note, how do they know who fired off the napalm?)

Because the Pentagon admitted it used them, the mark 77 firebombs.
Google this guy "Colonel James Alles" for more info.

 

[Jawz II]

Dave Barry's flaming pop-tart?

napalm = thick fuel(so it burns longer than regular gasoline)

real high tech crap that...

 

[stormbind]

Clearly it was Al-Qaeda terrorists attacking civilians with frozen orange juice concentrate.....

(On a more serious note, how do they know who fired off the napalm?)

On a more serious note, how do they know the napalm didn't land on civilians?

 

[zulu9812]

If it works, it works.

As do chemical & biological agents and nuclear weapons. Does that mean you support their use as well?

 

[zulu9812]

If the USA used Napalm, and they didnt sign an agreement to not use it, there is nothing anyone can say about. I am sure that the USA has many new technologies that they could use, causing more damamge than napalm. Besides, im sure the insurgents would have no qualms about using napalm on US citizens, why should we not use it one them?

You know, the USA's whole justification for just about every foreign policy they have is that they are good people, who are better than Saddam, better than Osama, etc. America is supposed to be better than the insurgents: it's not enough to simply say it, you actually have to be better

 

[Bronx Warlord]

I have no problems with the use of naplam, and if the bodies were that burnt there is no way to tell if they were insurgents/terrorists or not.

 

[Chairman Meow]

EDIT: BTW I think Bush wants to make Alberto Gonzales a high level judge. Bwahahaha. I'd love to see his judgements. "I'm sorry. The police may have bashed you but I don't think broken ribs and legs count as a "signficiant physical injury"." or "Well, sure the government may have put you in prison for 20 years by framing you, but since they did it in good faith because they truly thought you were guilty and did not have malicious intent to make you suffer or obtain personal gain I will have to deny your application for damages."

He wants to make him Attorney General, after the resignation of John Ashcroft.

 

[amadeus]

As do chemical & biological agents and nuclear weapons. Does that mean you support their use as well?

Their use would be counterproductive, as other countries would intervene in the conflict.

 

[zulu9812]

I'm speaking morally - do you think it is morally acceptable to use chemical, nuclear and biological weapons?

 

[zulu9812]

I have no problems with the use of naplam, and if the bodies were that burnt there is no way to tell if they were insurgents/terrorists or not.

How convenient. You know, when you might fight someone, you usually become like them. Not that I think Americans were ever noble or good, but that statement you just made was utterly callous and evil.

 

[Jawz II]

I have no problems with the use of naplam, and if the bodies were that burnt there is no way to tell if they were insurgents/terrorists or not.

a terrorist is someone who is terrorizing civilians

some one who is fighting troops can in no way be considered a terrorist

unless youre one of those people that watches fox news and calls everyone with olive skin and a beard a terrorist

 

[Speedo]

You have to love the irony of all of this. "Fill them with bullet holes, blow off limbs with explosives, let them slowly bleed to death while they look at their intestines on the ground next to them, but don't you dare burn them!"

 

[nonconformist]

Is there any difference between cutting a civilian's head off and burning a civilian to death?

 

[amadeus]

I'm speaking morally - do you think it is morally acceptable to use chemical, nuclear and biological weapons?

Depends on who is using them.

 

[Jawz II]

no it dosent

thats hypocracy

 

[amadeus]

It isn't hypocracy if you want your side to win.

 

[Jawz II]

what you want has nothing to do with wether its hypocracy or not

 

[nonconformist]

It isn't hypocracy if you want your side to win.

So it is perfectly alright for Iraqis to cut off American's heads?