How many civs should we play against?

[Chieftess]

Select 1-15.

 

[Zur]

15
FA would have a hard time tho, hehe.

 

[donsig]

This is a tough one to vote on. Seems like it depends on some other decisions, like map size. Having many opponents would be fun but as the game progresses the turns chats would become unwieldy. Of course if we made turn chats optional and based terms on a given number of turns played rather than the real calender then the choice of number of opponents can be made in a different light.

 

[Shaitan]

I vote for "whatever the normal amount for our map size is".

 

[Phoenix]

i like to see lots of opponents (15) so thata we can have many wars. Dont get me wrong im not a war mongerer but wars make things interesting.

 

[Chieftess]

It was a tough poll to put up.
But, some wanted it, so I put it in.

 

[Eklektikos]

I vote we close this one until we know what choices we actually do have, and therefore not risk letting anyone waste their vote

 

[Shaitan]

I second that notion. At the least, there should be a "default" choice.

 

[GenMarshall]

Ho no, not again with the default or random choices .

 

[Chris85]

I think we should play with the total package of 15 other civs. However, maybe we should play the default for our map size.

 

[Stuck_as_a_Mac]

we should wait till we know how big our map is and what our victory conditions will be.

 

[Danke]

Originally posted by Stuck_As_a_Mac
we should wait till we know how big our map is and what our victory conditions will be.

I'm with stuck, but assuming huge world and all victory conditions, I vote 15

 

[Daaraa]

I voted 10. I like breathing space. However, that would depend on world size as many have already stated.
Another point is the speed at which the late-game turns will be played. If we had 15 civs on a huge world and in the 1800's we still had 15 civs, the time between turns would be horiffic

 

[Shaitan]

As the world size poll has turned up with a decided lead by "huge" I have voted for 15 civs here.