How to handle version-differences in the HOF

[Lexad]

If quechuarush shouldn't be in HoF, then with all honesty so shouldn't be there Praets, Cossacks, and just imagine the advantage fast worker gives you troughout the game of fast speeds! IMO if it is in the game and supposed to be there, let it be.

 

[superslug]

would it be much more work to design this unofficial filter in a way that you couldn't just only select by expansion, but also by major patch?

Probably not.

 

[Bastian-Bux]

Would you include that option? This way you don't even need to delete a whole patch from the HOF table if need arises. Its enough to flag it "inappropriate", so that it doesn't show up in the major selections, but can be seen when you select the correct patch range.

Plus this way you'd get a great way to compare different patches, enabling you to stomp "improvement suggestions" with hard data instead of dictatorial powers. Its always better to stomp someone being able to say: "You are wrong" instead of saying "Because I say so".

 

[superslug]

Its always better to stomp someone being able to say: "You are wrong" instead of saying "Because I say so".

But what if you're wrong because I say so?

 

[Bastian-Bux]

Then you still stomped me. But its a quechua rush on settler duell only, and not a deity huge time victory.

 

[CliftonBazaar]

IMO if it is in the game and supposed to be there, let it be.

That's my point; where do you draw the line? IF Quecha rush was banned then I would bet that Pretorians would become the most powerful UU in Diety, so then everyone would be using that.
You can't draw a line and not annoy someone so you might as well not draw any lines and let the game be.