Originally posted by No.Dice
Why would we switch at all, If Republic is going to allow us everything a democracy does, with the freedom to fight wars with practically no time constraints?
And it also generates more income too.


Originally posted by No.Dice
Why would we switch at all, If Republic is going to allow us everything a democracy does, with the freedom to fight wars with practically no time constraints?
That's what I thought.Originally posted by Zachriel
Oh. You are right. That was Ozymandius.
Yup, I would never change to anything else once I switch to democracy. For richer or poorer, I'm going to stay with my democratic civ to the end of game.Originally posted by Bamspeedy
So IMHO only go to democracy if you will be staying there for a long time. If you change more than once, or start suffering massive war weariness, you've just negated any benefits of democracy.
If I'm religious I usually switch to Monarchy during war.Originally posted by Moonsinger
Yup, I would never change to anything else once I switch to democracy. For richer or poorer, I'm going to stay with my democratic civ to the end of game.![]()
That has never happened to me. You should be able to last at least 40 turns of war in Democracy without much of a problem. If I have to stay at war longer than that, I just allocate all of my income to keep them happy. Of course, if that still doesn't work, let them starve to dead.Originally posted by Grey Fox
My Democracy just collapsed into anarchy, and I kept every citixen happy with Entertainers![]()
Originally posted by Moonsinger
Oh, I forgot to mention. It seems to me that religious or military civs like to stay at war longer than commence or scientific civs. Therefore, we better watch out for those guys; they like to prolong the war forever.![]()
Originally posted by Night Raider
When I go into diplomatic relations I get reminded on how I double-crossed the Aztecs, any ideas on why this might be?
He is a militaristic civ! That's why he like to be at war. Just like I previously mentioned, religious or militaristic civ seem to prolong war.Originally posted by Trinity
I'm not so sure I completely agree. Xerses is a major pain. It seems he's always at war. What's up with that?
Well, the English is a comercial and expansionist civ; therefore, war is not good for business.The best behaved civ I've run into is the English. They always seem to quietly build up.
Since Rome is a militaristic civ, it supposes to attack and conquer the weaker civ. Germany and Japan would also like to do the same thing. Btw, I would have done the same thing too.Originally posted by Zeromus
Rome, my neighbor, declared war on me for no reason and took three of my border cities that same turn. I froze in disbelief. Not only because this would be my first victory on emperor, giving me the "right" to play on deity, but they BROKE A ROP! For no reason!