ToV said:Take a look at the pre-release information. The Indian workers and normal workers have the same movement. So it seems that the fast worker actually makes improvements faster, not move faster.
Movement rate is part of building. Remember in CIV III that you could move your worker spots on a road. So you were able to move him 2 spots and begin work right away. This is the same basic benefit in CIV IV. You will be able to move your worker 2 spots and then start work, where a normal worker will only be able to move to that location and then start work the following turn. So you actually get a 33% increase in building as well as movement. May not seem like much but over the course of the entire game it should add up quite nicely.civaddict098 said:The new preview confirms that the worker has 3 movement not faster building rate. I personaly think this isnt such a great boost but now that i think of it with railroads not giving unlimited movement this will be a crucial unit in big civs, but come to think of it i dont think big civs will be a good idea this time around![]()
I think you are underestimating the value of infrastructure in this game.Krikkitone said:Well possibly, given that the regular worker has 2 move, I think this will definitely not be that big of an improvement.
Exactly, and because of this benefit while other nations are spending turns and resources building workers, India will be building troops, city improvements and wonders... So in theory, they should have great big beautiful cities!!EvilGuy said:The only advantage i can see here is that India will simply need less workers to get the job done.
Like if any nation would have, say, 10 workers, then India would have 7 or 8, and their building capacity/speed would be roughly equivalent in the long term...
Civrules said:Nah, that's a mistake. It is actually 35 hammers. I'll ask TF to fix it for me.Thanks for pointing it out.
[EDIT] There's one or two more incorrect hammer #s...
Keshik 50 Hammers.
Skirmisher 25 Hammers.
Fast worker 60 Hammers.
@ oxonian2001 - That should be correct.