Well... Im disappointed.
When i went to buy Civ 5 i expected a better/improved version of Civ4. Civ4 was worked out pretty well already, maybe some features change, some new features added. BUT NOW CUT OUT HALF OF THE GAME! I feel like playing a demo version. Why is that? They wanna sell 2 Add-ons?....
Ofc change is interesting... but its just boring compared to civ 4. I want strategies, flexbiliy, the feeling of building up an empire and leading it, making my decisions important. Now it just feels kinda, i dont know... dumb? If i wanna play war i buy an rts... Civ 4 had a rly great mix. And why not just introduce a flexible war system and leave the well working economy system alone (or improve it), but not cripple it thx...
And a game like civ needs expansion, over... i dont like having 7 cities and done. Whats the point?
Even this policy system, interesting, flexible... IF U COULD CHANGE THOSE. Great, i plan my whole policy system 6000 years ahead, hooray... Im wondering, they made civ4, they played it, they noticed people loved it... and then they go and make civ5?... They didnt test it or what? Didnt they notice anything?...
And btw.. more options for games, similar to civ 4?... ^^
Im hoping for some really good mods
How is it possible to go 3 steps back with a fifth episode of a game...