Leaders that shouldn't be there!

"I don't think that slavery is really any better or worse than working 9-5 every weekday for almost your entire life. Sure, there were a few exceptions where slave owners treated their slaves very very poorly, but for the most part they were basically just treated like minimum-wage workers are treated today. Do your job, and you'll have food and shelter."
 
"I don't think that slavery is really any better or worse than working 9-5 every weekday for almost your entire life. Sure, there were a few exceptions where slave owners treated their slaves very very poorly, but for the most part they were basically just treated like minimum-wage workers are treated today. Do your job, and you'll have food and shelter."
And where did I say that I would be alright with working 9-5? :rolleyes: I hate being on a schedule.
 
I don't think that slavery is really any better or worse than working 9-5 every weekday for almost your entire life. Sure, there were a few exceptions where slave owners treated their slaves very very poorly, but for the most part they were basically just treated like minimum-wage workers are treated today. Do your job, and you'll have food and shelter.

Discussion finished. Thread may die.














Oh wait, that was off-topic.
 
Well, I'm going to unsubscribe from this thread now. I figured I would at least post a response to the suggestions I made at least three pages ago, but I was busy all week. And then seeing this insanity has saddened my heart.
 
Discussion finished. Thread may die.
Oh wait, that was off-topic.

I agree. Peng and Blaarg have been attacking eachother the past few days, haven't been reading any of it. They should make their own personal thread. :p
 
Economic Left/Right: 5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.26

I get the "Economic Left/Right: 5.75". That seems pretty aligned with the content of your posts, but the "Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.26" confuses me.

You have the tax and welfare policy of a libertarian, but you seem to be in favor of government intervention in peoples personal lives... Is you wallet more important then your freedom to control your life? I've taken the test, and to score that high on the authority scale you need to be against quite a few things, and approve the banning of them.

I don't really have a point, I'm just baffled.

Kind of reminds me of left-wingers who hate tobacco but want to legalize marijuana.
 
You have the tax and welfare policy of a libertarian, but you seem to be in favor of government intervention in peoples personal lives... Is you wallet more important then your freedom to control your life? I've taken the test, and to score that high on the authority scale you need to be against quite a few things, and approve the banning of them.
Basically, I'm in favor of legislating basic fundamental morality. I also think that there is a power hierarchy in the world with leaders and followers and that there's nothing wrong with that; it should be embraced and accepted. People should understand that there will always be people more intelligent, more capable, and more informed than they are and should not expect people to treat all opinions equally. Essentially, by recognizing that some individuals are superior and some are inferior, I think society would run a lot more smoothly. And please note that I said some individuals are superior or inferior, not some "races" or some "genders" or anything kooky like that.
Kind of reminds me of left-wingers who hate tobacco but want to legalize marijuana.
Yeah, I don't get that, either. I think it's mostly due to the pro-marijuana propaganda running around and partly because tobacco is run by "big, evil corporations" whereas marijuana obviously is not.
 
Basically, I'm in favor of legislating basic fundamental morality. I also think that there is a power hierarchy in the world with leaders and followers and that there's nothing wrong with that; it should be embraced and accepted. People should understand that there will always be people more intelligent, more capable, and more informed than they are and should not expect people to treat all opinions equally. Essentially, by recognizing that some individuals are superior and some are inferior, I think society would run a lot more smoothly.

Excellent, you just need to accept that some people who are more intelligent, capable and informed then you are have decided that you, and most of us really, need to give some of your money to pay for services you might not need (right now), and help people you might not want to help. There is nothing wrong with this and it should be embraced and accepted by you. There, that settles that.

And if my point got lost in my rant: If you accept, or expect others to accept, some peoples definition of morality on the basis that the ar just "more intelligent, more capable, and more informed" then you should be just as ready to accept that others know what's best for you when it comes to spending your money.

As for legislating morality: You phail. The defunct morals of your dated religion has long since been replaced by better models for how to run a society. But by all means, keep thumping the little book you chosen avatar holds on to. :)

And why would I think you were being racist? You're not racist, you are just a bit in love with your self, and need to read something other then propaganda for a few years.

I agree with you on the whole weed thing though.
 
Excellent, you just need to accept that some people who are more intelligent, capable and informed then you are have decided that you, and most of us really, need to give some of your money to pay for services you might not need (right now), and help people you might not want to help.
False. Most people who are more intelligent, capable, and informed than I am do not believe in socialism of any kind. It's corrupt morons scrambling for votes and people with too much "rich guilt" that think that socialism is a good idea.
As for legislating morality: You phail. The defunct morals of your dated religion has long since been replaced by better models for how to run a society. But by all means, keep thumping the little book you chosen avatar holds on to. :)
Which book is that? I wasn't aware that I was a member of any religion.
And why would I think you were being racist? You're not racist, you are just a bit in love with your self, and need to read something other then propaganda for a few years.
What propaganda do you think I read?
 
What propaganda do you think I read?

Honestly, I don't think anyone has done a poll of economists asking them about it, but I can show you the things that convinced me that he was bad for the economy:
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/02/24/how-fdr-destroyed-the-dollar/ (This one's obviously a bit biased.)
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3357
(This is the better one, since it cites individuals from whom they get their information.)


That kind. However, and serious neo-con or right winger would know better then to use stuff like that in a debate.

And after going over some more of your posts in other places and forums, I can safely say you are a troll. A damn good one, but still: Just a troll. Good night.
 
Good Night! Sleep tight! Let this thread DIE! PLEASE??
All these quote wars are OT and the original poster is insane. Just read the first post people!!! Winston Freaking Churchill???? :eek: Comon guys!
 
That kind. However, and serious neo-con or right winger would know better then to use stuff like that in a debate.
The Cato Institute isn't a propaganda center, it's a libertarian think-tank. So you're trying to tell me that libertarian propaganda has made me into an authoritarian? It boggles the mind. :crazyeye:
And after going over some more of your posts in other places and forums, I can safely say you are a troll. A damn good one, but still: Just a troll. Good night.
Well, I'm not. There really are people in the world who don't think the same way you do. I'm sorry if that frightens you.
 
I always wanted to know what a troll was but was too afraid to ask; so is this what a troll is?
Someone who trolls...:D
It means someone that flames (gets pissed and turns down, etc.) at other people. Basically it means they're mean. :crazyeye:
 
Akaoz:

thank you for being the SINGLE other Republican on this entire board. At least I say that judging by this: and most of us really, need to give some of your money to pay for services you might not need (right now), and help people you might not want to help.

that is the definition of liberal straight hippy bull sh!t. thank you.

Edit: In other words, my old man knows how to spend his pay check better than the government does.
 
People should understand that there will always be people more intelligent, more capable, and more informed than they are and should not expect people to treat all opinions equally. Essentially, by recognizing that some individuals are superior and some are inferior, I think society would run a lot more smoothly. And please note that I said some individuals are superior or inferior, not some "races" or some "genders" or anything kooky like that.

Man, nothing personal, but if I knew you in RL life, I don't think I would like you much! :crazyeye:

OK, maybe that was a bit personal, and I am sorry! Anyway, this is the internet, you got the right to express your ideas! Or..You are not against it, are you?
 
Back
Top Bottom